灰鹤在迁徙途中撞击高压线 伤亡分析与视觉盲区初探
作者:
作者单位:

1.中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所 乌鲁木齐 830011;2.南昌大学生命科学研究院流域生态学研究所 南昌 330031;3.英国伯明翰大学生物科学院 B15 2TT UK

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(No. 31572292,31272291,30970340)和生态环境部生物多样性保护重大工程专项

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [1]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    广布于欧亚大陆的灰鹤(Grus grus)又叫普通鹤、欧亚鹤。依据2019-2021年在乌鲁木齐郊区连续三年搜集灰鹤迁徙期遭遇高压线(220kv)拦截遇难的数据,简单介绍伤亡案例的特点。可能是因为灰鹤前端有一个视觉盲区,约49只灰鹤碰撞了高压线。之前,媒体报道的伤亡数更多,每千只伤亡率达5.4%。伤亡者多是1龄以上4龄以内的亚成鸟(占94%),未见1龄内幼鸟。现场解剖,伤亡者的断翅率最高,达到53%;腿被撞折的比率也很高,达51%;腹部或背部擦伤占24%;头或颈部碰伤约为14%。因为碰挂后落地(≥30m架空线),造成二次受伤,结果有41%的灰鹤身体是多处受伤。最后,对视野盲区进行了深入分析,并介绍和推荐几种行之有效的解决办法。

    Abstract:

    Common crane (Grus grus), also known as the Eurasian crane, is widely distributed in China. From 2019 to 2021, some cranes were in trouble when they stopped in the suburbs of Urumqi and were running into 220 kV transmission lines. Probably because there was a blind area in the front of crane, about 49 cranes fell after hitting the high-voltage line. And more injuries and deaths were reported by the local media previously, with a casualty rate of 5.4% per 1000 cranes. Cornfields and wetlands near the power line are the places where the cranes like to go, but the death toll in previous years was not so much. We examined the cranes in the field, all of which were sub-adults (more than 94% is 2-4 years old; such as their body feathers were lighter and the top of the head without red spot). According to observations, thousands of adult Common cranes have passed through this area in mid-March and late, with no casualties. Why we didn"t find the dead bodies of the one-year-old cranes then? Maybe they were led by experienced parents at that time. Examination of the injured body parts showed that the Common crane had the highest rate of broken wings, reaching 53%; the rate of leg fracture was also high, up to 51%; abdominal or back abrasions accounted for 24%; head or neck bruises were about 14%; about 41% of the injured cranes were with multiple injuries. Finally, we analyze the blind area of vision, and try to discuss, introduce and recommend several effective solutions. 修改:Common cranes (Grus grus), are widely distributed in China. Some of the population pass through the area around Urumqi (Western China) during their annual migrations. A number of these birds collide with power lines (220 kV transmission). Between 2019 and 2021 systematic surveys were conducted and at least 49 cranes were recorded killed because of hitting power lines. Injuries and deaths more than this number have been casually reported and we estimate the casualty rate to be about 5.4 % of all cranes visiting the area (Table 1). This death toll may be increasing. Cornfields and wetlands near power lines are the habitats frequented by the cranes. We examined cranes which had apparently collided with power lines, all were sub-adults (more than 94 % were 2-4 years old birds; body feathers were lighter than in fully mature adults and the top of the head was without the red marking). According to observations, thousands of adult Common cranes pass through this area in mid-March and later, but apparently there are no casualties. Why did we not find the dead bodies of one-year-old cranes? We suggest that they were led by experienced parents at that time. Examination of the injured body parts showed a high rate of broken wings, (53 %) and broken legs (51 %); abdominal or back abrasions were found on 24 % of birds, and head or neck bruises on about 14 %. About 41 % of the injured cranes had multiple injuries (Table 1). Why do these birds collide with power lines? Part of the explanation may lie in the frontal area of blind vision which projects in the direction of travel when a flying crane pitches its head forward to look down (Fig. 1c), perhaps searching for other cranes on the ground or suitable feeding areas. We discuss and recommend several effective solutions that should increase power line visibility and reduce crane collisions and deaths.

    参考文献
    Alonso J A, Alonso J C, Nowald G. 2008. Migration and wintering patterns of a central European population of Common cranes Grus grus. Bird Study, 55(1): 1–7. Bevanger K. 1998. Biological and conservation aspects of bird mortality caused by electricity power lines: a review. Biological Conservation, 86(1): 67–76, Brown W M, Drewien R C. 1995. Evaluation of two power-line markers to reduce crane and waterfowl collision mortality. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 23: 217–227. Drewitt A L, Langston R H W. 2008. Collision effects of wind-power generators and other obstacles on birds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1134(1): 233–266. Hodos W, Erichsen J T. 1990. Lower-field myopia in birds is predicted by the bird’s height: an adaptation to keep that ground in focus. Vision Research, 30(5): 653–657. Ilyashenko E, Belyalov O V, Ilyashenko V Y, et al. 2018. Results of crane tagging at Tuzkol Lake, Kazakhstan, in 2017. Newsletter of the Crane Working Group of Eurasia, 14: 89–101. Janss G F E. 2000. Avian mortality from power lines: a morphologic approach of a species-specific mortality. Biological Conservation, 95(2): 353–359. Janss G F E, Ferrer M. 2000. Common crane and great bustard collision with power lines: collision rate and risk exposure. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 28(3): 675–680. Jenkins A R, Smallie J J, Diamond M. 2010. Avian collisions with power lines: a global review of causes and mitigation with a South African perspective. Bird Conservation Intnational, 20(2): 263–278. Lee J C I, Tsai L C, Hwa P Y, et al. 2010. A novel strategy for avian species and gender identification using the CHD gene. Molecular and Cellular Probes, 24(1): 27–31. Li F-S, Bishop M A, Drolma T. 2011.Power line strikes by Black- necked Cranes and Bar-headed Geese in Tibet Autonomous Region. Chinese Birds, 2(4): 167–173. Loss S R, Will T, Marra P P. 2014. Refining estimates of bird collision and electrocution mortality at power lines in the United States. PLoS One, 9(7): e101565. Ma M, Li J, Jiang K, et al. 2019. Accidental death of more than 40 common cranes near Urumqi. China Crane News, 23(1): 32–35. Martin G R. 2009. What is binocular vision for? A birds’ eye view. Journal of Vision, 9(11): 14, 1–19. Martin G R. 2011. Understanding bird collisions with man-made objects: a sensory ecology approach. Ibis, 153(2): 239–254. Martin G R. 2017. The Sensory Ecology of Birds. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Martin G R, Portugal S J & Murn C P. 2012. Visual fields, foraging and collision vulnerability in Gyps vultures Ibis. Ibis, 154: 626–631. Martin G R, Shaw J M. 2010. Bird collisions with power lines: Failing to see the way ahead? Biological Conservation, 143: 2695–2702. Schaub M, Pradel R. 2004. Assessing the relative importance of different sources of mortality from recoveries of marked animals. Ecology, 85(4): 930–938. Shaw J M, Jenkins A R, Smallie J J, et al. 2010. Modelling power- line collision risk for the Blue Crane Anthropoides paradiseus in South Africa. Ibis, 152: 590–599. Tucker V A. 2000. The deep fovea, sideways vision and spiral flight paths in raptors. Journal of Experimental Biology, 203: 3745– 3754. White C R, Day N, Butler P J, et al. 2007. Vision and foraging in cormorants: More like herons than hawks? PLoS One, 2: e639. 李军伟, 马鸣, 孟凡娟, 等. 2020. 灰鹤在天山木扎提河湿地越冬及行为观察. 生态与农村环境学报, 36(5): 573–579. 刘慧, 刘强, 刘文, 等. 2018. 宁夏中卫黄河沿岸迁徙灰鹤停歇模式. 动物学杂志, 53(2): 161–171. 马鸣, Ilyashenko V. 2018. 卫星跟踪灰鹤翻越天山的迁徙路径. 中国鹤类通讯, 22(2): 4–8. 马鸣, 才代, 井长林, 等. 1993. 新疆灰鹤和蓑羽鹤的繁殖生态. 干旱区研究, 10(2): 56–60. 马元珽. 2005. 减少风轮机与鸟类碰撞的新方法. 水利水电快报, 26(3): 30. 梅宇, 马鸣, Dixon A,等. 2008. 中国西部电网电击猛禽致死事故调查. 动物学杂志, 43(4): 114–117. 王博驰, 裴雯, 色拥军, 等. 2021.卫星跟踪揭示撞击电线是黑颈鹤幼鸟越冬地死亡的主要原因. 动物学杂志, 56(2): 161–170. 王超, 闫鲁, 高洁, 等. 2020. 陕西汉中朱鹮在输电线路铁塔上的营巢状况及保护建议. 动物学杂志, 55(6): 712–719. 王述潮, 马鸣. 2019. 卫星跟踪猎隼失联案例分析. 动物学杂志, 54(1): 1–7.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

马鸣,蒋可威,梅宇,王文娟,Graham Martin,李军伟,陈雨萧,王述潮,吴道宁.2021.灰鹤在迁徙途中撞击高压线 伤亡分析与视觉盲区初探.动物学杂志,56(5):648-654.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-06
  • 最后修改日期:2021-07-04
  • 录用日期:2021-09-03
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-10-09
  • 出版日期: 2021-10-20