社会性单配制鸟类婚外父权的发生和影响因素
作者:
作者单位:

辽宁大学生命科学院 辽宁省动物资源与疫病防治重点实验室 辽宁 沈阳 110036,辽宁大学生命科学院 辽宁省动物资源与疫病防治重点实验室 辽宁 沈阳 110036,辽宁大学生命科学院 辽宁省动物资源与疫病防治重点实验室 辽宁 沈阳 110036

基金项目:

国家自然科学(No. 31071927);


The Occurrence and Factors of the Extra-pair Paternity in Socially Monogamous Birds
Author:
Affiliation:

Key Laboratory of Animal Resource and Epidemic Disease Prevention Department of Life Sciences Liaoning University Shenyang

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [121]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    一雌一雄单配制鸟类中,雌性个体与配偶外雄性发生交配的行为称为婚外交配,继而导致了婚外受精产生婚外子代的现象称为产生了婚外父权。婚外父权广泛存在于鸟类中,针对其发生和影响因素已经成为了鸟类行为生态学研究的热点。本文收集了近十年社会性单配制鸟类婚外父权方面的研究文献,从婚外父权的发生及其影响因素两个方面综述了单配制鸟类婚外父权的研究进展。婚外父权发生原因的探讨主要包括:1、从两性的角度探讨雌雄两性在婚外行为中不同的进化繁殖策略。雄性策略旨在增加自身的繁殖输出;有关雌性策略则提出了确保受精假说、食物供给假说、遗传利益假说等,但目前尚存争议;2、在遗传利益假说中较常见的又分为3个假说:“优秀基因”假说、“遗传相容性”假说和“遗传多样性”假说,该三种假说是针对雌性从遗传方面获得的利益而提出的,不断有报道指出雌性配偶选择会被潜在的雄性遗传特性所影响;3、非遗传利益——母系效应影响婚外父权的进化。一些研究指出遗传质量参数,如体重、身体大小、存活率和免疫应答等方面可能会存在母系效应。婚外父权发生的影响因素这里主要指环境因素,包括繁殖同步性、繁殖密度、栖息地环境、产卵及孵化时机等。由于物种不同,受到环境压力不同,导致婚外父权发生率千差万别。最后本文针对未来的研究方向做出了展望。尽管近十年的研究进一步解释了鸟类婚外父权现象,但是该领域仍然存在并且产生了许多新的未解决的问题,而相关实验操作和理论的完善是深入探讨这些问题的关键。

    Abstract:

    Researchers have found that extra-pair paternity prevails among socially monogamous birds and this phenomenon challenges traditional views of mating system by using molecular technology. Contrary to prior expectations, birds are very rarely sexually monogamous since extra-pair offspring has been found in approximately 90% of species. Even among socially monogamous species, over 11% of offspring are, extra-pair paternity on average. Extra-pair paternity arises when female birds engage in extra-pair copulations with males other than their social mates, frequently resulting in broods with multiple paternity which contain offspring sired by the social male and offspring sired by extra-pair males. A large and solid body of evidence has impressively demonstrated that extra-pair paternity is the rule rather than the exception in birds (especially in passerines), and a number of synthetic contributions have reviewed this field with its various ramifications over the last decade. Extra-pair paternity is widespread in avian species so that the reason for the occurrence of extra-pair paternity and the influence has become the focus researches in the behavioral ecology of avian species. Based on the researches about avian extra-pair paternity over the past decade, this paper reviews the research progress and summarizes two major aspects on causes and effects of extra-pair paternity. Investigating the causes of extramarital paternity includes: 1, we explore the different sexes in the evolution of reproductive strategies from gender perspective. Male reproductive strategies designed to increase their output; Female strategies are proposed to ensure that female fertility hypothesis, the food supply hypothesis, the hypothesis of genetic benefits, etc., but still controversial.2, The genetic benefit hypothesis ("good genes" hypothesis, "genetic compatibility" hypothesis, the hypothesis of genetic diversity) proposes that extra-pair sires provide alleles of superior quality and/or better compatibility compared to the social mate, resulting in offspring of higher reproductive value. One frequently adopted approach to test this idea is to compare the performance of maternal half-siblings in broods with multiple paternity. However, results did not come to a conclusion, some studies failed to reveal any systematic differences in maternal half-sibling performance, even in the same or in closely related species. Furthermore, application of identical experimental protocols (e.g. the phytohemagglutinin test of cellular immunocompetence) in different species with similar extra-pair mating systems produced mixed results. The inconsistencies of results across extra-pair paternity studies may be caused by methodological challenges and/or reflect true and meaningful differences in the respective study systems. 3, Non-genetic benefit-maternal effects influence the evolution of extrapair paternity. Some studies indicated that genetic quality, such as weight, body size, survival and immune responses, etc may be effected by maternal effects.We also summarize environmental factors affecting the occurrence of extra-pair paternity include reproductive synchrony, breeding density, habitat, etc. Different species have different environmental pressures resulting in the difference of extrapair paternity rate. Finally, we make prospects for the future research. Despite nearly a decade of researches to further explain the phenomenon of extra-pair paternity in birds, an certain reason is still unknown. Experimental operation and the improvement of the theory are keys reach a more comprehensive solution to these problems.

    参考文献
    Adler M. 2010. Sexual conflict in waterfowl: why do females resist extrapair copulations? Behavioral Ecology, 21(1): 182-192.
    Adrian O, Brockmann I, Hohoff C, et al. 2005. Paternal behaviour in wild guinea pigs: a comparative study in three closely related species with different social and mating systems. Journal of Zoology, 265(1): 97-105.
    Ak?ay E, Roughgarden J. 2007. Extra-pair paternity in birds: review of the genetic benefits. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 9: 855-868.
    Albrecht T, Schnitzer J, Kreisinger J, et al. 2007. Extrapair paternity and the opportunity for sexual selection in long-distant migratory passerines.Behavioral Ecology, 18(2): 477-486.
    Arnqvist G, Kirkpatrick M. 2005. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behavior in females. The American Naturalist, 165(5): 26-37.
    Birkhead T. 1987. Sperm competition in birds . Trends in ecology evolution , 2 (9) : 268-272.
    Blackmore C J, Heinsohn R. 2008. Variable mating strategies and incest avoidance in cooperatively breeding grey-crowned babblers. Animal Behaviour, 75(1): 63-70.
    Bollmer J L, Dunn P O, Freeman-Gallant C R, et al. 2012. Social and extra-pair mating in relation to major histocompatibility complex variation in common yellowthroats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279(1748): 4778–4785.
    Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth S F. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends in Ecology Evolution, 24(5): 280-288.
    Bonneaud C, Chastel O, Federici P. 2006. Complex Mhc-based mate choice in a wild passerine.Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273(1590): 1111-1116.
    Bouwman K M, van Dijk RE, Wijmenga J. 2007. Older male reed buntings are more successful at gaining extrapair fertilizations. Animal Behaviour, 73(1): 15-27.
    Brekke P, Cassey P, Ariani C, et al. 2013. Evolution of extreme-mating behaviour: patterns of extrapair paternity in a species with forced extrapair copulation. Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 67(6): 963-972.
    Brekke P, Wang J, Bennett P M, et al. 2012. Postcopulatory mechanisms of inbreeding avoidance in the island endemic hihi (Notiomystis cincta). Behavioral Ecology, 23(2): 278-284.
    Brouwer L, Barr I, Van De Pol M, et al. 2010. MHC-dependent survival in a wild population: evidence for hidden genetic benefits gained through extra-pair fertilizations. Molecular Ecology, 19(16): 3444-3455.
    Brown J L. 1997. A theory of mate choice based on heterozygosity.Behavioral Ecology, 8(1): 60-65.
    Burg T M, Croxall J P. 2006. Extrapair paternities in black-browed Thalassarche melanophris grey-headed T chrysostoma and wandering albatross Diomedea exulans at South Georgia. Journal of Avian Biology, 37(4): 331-338.
    Canal D, Jovani R, Potti J. 2012. Male decisions or female accessibility? Spatiotemporal patterns of extra pair paternity in aSsongbird. Behavioral Ecology, 23(5): 1146-1153.
    Charmantier A, Perret P. 2004. Manipulation of nest-box density affects extra-pair paternity in a population of blue tits (Parus caeruleus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 56(4): 360-365.
    Clutton-Brock T H. 1991. The Evolution of Parental Care . Princeton : Princeton University Press.
    Cockburn A. 2006. Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B,273 (1592): 1375-1383.
    Cockburn A, Dalziell A H, CJ Blackmore, et al. 2009. Superb fairy-wren males aggregate into hidden leks to solicit extragroup fertilizations before dawn. Behavioral Ecology, 20(3): 501-510.
    Conway C J, Martin T E. 2000. Evolution of passerine incubation behavior: influence of food, temperature, and nest predation. Evolution 54(2): 670-685.
    Dunn P O, Garvin J C, Whittingham L A, et al. 2010. Carotenoid and melanin-based ornaments signal similar aspects of male quality in two populations of the common yellow-throat. Functional Ecology, 24(1): 149-158.
    Edly-Wright C, Schwagmeyer P L, Parker P G, et al. 2007. Genetic similarity of mates, offspring health and extrapair fertilization in house sparrows. Animal Behaviour, 73(2): 367-378.
    Eliassen S, Kokko H. 2008. Current analyses do not resolve whether extra-pair paternity is male or female driven. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 62(11): 1795-1804.
    Ewen J G, Armstrong D P, Lambert D.1999. Floater males gain reproductive success through extrapair fertilizations in the stitchbird.Animal Behaviour, 58(2): 321–328.
    Ferree E D, Dickinson J, Rendell W, et al. 2010. Hatching order explains an extrapair chick advantage in western bluebirds.Behavioral Ecology, 21(4): 802-807.
    Ferretti V, Massoni V, Bulit F, et al. 2011. Heterozygosity and fitness benefits of extrapair mate choice in White-rumped Swallows(Tachycineta leucorrhoa). Behavioral Ecology, 22(6): 1178-1186.
    Fontaine J J, Martin T E. 2006. Parent birds assess nest predation risk and adjust their reproductive strategies. Ecology Letters, 9(4): 28-34.
    Forsman A M, Vogel L A, Sakaluk S K, et al. 2008. Female house wrens (Troglodytes aedon) increase the size,but not immunocompetence, of their offspring through extra-pair mating.Molecular Ecology, 17(16): 3697-3706.
    Forstmeier W. 2007. Do individual females differ intrinsically in their propensity to engage in extra-pair copulations?.PLoS One, 2(9):e952.
    Forstmeier W, Martin K, Bolund E, et al. 2011. Female extrapair mating behavior can evolve via indirect selection on males. Pans, 108(26): 10608-10613.
    Freeman-Gallant C R,Wheelwright N T, Meiklejohn K.E, et al. 2006. Genetic similarity, extrapair paternity, and offspring quality in Savannah sparrows(Passerculus sandwichensis). Behavioral Ecology, 17(6): 952-958.
    Garvin J C, Abroe B, Pedersen M C, et al. 2006. Immune response of nestling warblers varies with extra-pair paternity and temperature. Molecular Ecology, 15(12): 3833-3840.
    Garvin J C, Dunn P O, Whittingham L A, et al. 2008. Do male ornaments signal immunity in the common yellowthroat?. Behavioral Ecology, 19(1): 54-60.
    Gray E M. 1997. Do female red-winged blackbirds benefit genetically from seeking extra-pair copulations?. Animal Behaviour, 53(3): 605-623.
    Griffith S C. 2007. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: neglected components of direct and indirect selection.The American Naturalist, 169(2): 274-281.
    Griffith S C, Immler S. 2009. Female infidelity and genetic compatibility in birds: the role of the genetically loaded raffle in understanding the function of extra-pair paternity. Journal of Avian Biology, 40(2): 97-101.
    Griffith S C, Owens I P F, Thuman K A. 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function.Molecular Ecology, 11(11): 2195-2212.
    Halliday T, Arnold S J. 1987. Multiple mating by females-A perspective from quantitative genetics. Animal Behaviour, 35: 939-941.
    Hansson B. 2004. Marker-based relatedness predicts egg-hatching failure in great reed warblers. Conservation Genetics ,5(3): 339-348.
    Hasson O, Stone L. 2011. Why do females have so few extra-pair offspring?.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 65(3): 513-523.
    Hogg J T, Forbes S H .1997. Mating in bighorn sheep: frequent male reproduction via a high-risk“unconventional” tactic. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41(1): 33-48.
    Jennions M D, Petrie M. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75(1): 21-74.
    Jones G M, Techow N M S M, Ryan P G. 2012. Dalliances and doubtful dads: what determines extra-pair paternity in socially monogamous wandering albatrosses? .Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66(9): 1213-1224.
    Jouventin P, Charmantier A, Dubois M P, et al. 2007. Extra-pair paternity in the strongly monogamous wandering albatross Diomedea exulans has no apparent benefits for females.Ibis, 149(1): 67-78.
    Kahn A T, Mautz B, Jennions M D. 2010. Females prefer to associate with males with longer intromittent organs in mosquitofish. Biology letters, 6(1): 55-58.
    Kawano K M, Yamaguchi N, Kasuya E, et al. 2009. Extra-pair mate choice in the female great tit Parus major: good males or compatible males. Journal of ethology, 27(3): 349-359.
    Kempenaers B. 2007. Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 37: 189-278.
    Kempenaers B, Borgstr?m P, Lo?s P, et al. 2010 Arti?cial Night Lighting Affects Dawn Song, Extra-Pair Siring Success, and Lay Date in Songbirds. Current Biology, 20(19): 1735-1739.
    Kempenaers B, Verheyen G R, Dhondt A A .1997. Extra-pair paternity in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus): female choice, male characteristics, and offspring quality. Behavioral Ecology, 8(5): 481-492.
    King J R. 1973. Energetics of reproduction in birds. In: Breeding Biology of Birds Washington D.C,National Academy of Sciences, 78-107.
    Kirkpatrick M, Barton N H . 1997. The strength of indirect selection on female mating pReferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA , 94(4): 1282-1286.
    Kokko H, Jennions M D. 2008. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of evolutionary biology, 21(4): 919-948.
    Kreisinger J, Munclinger P, Jav?rková V, et al. 2010. Analysis of extra-pair paternity and conspecific brood parasitism in mallards Anas platyrhynchos using noninvasive techniques. Journal of Avian Biology, 41(5): 551-557.
    Krist Milo?, Nádvorník P, Uvírová L, et al . 2005. Paternity covaries with laying and hatching order in the collared flycatcher Ficedula albicollis . Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 59(1): 6-11.
    LaBarbera K, Llambías P E, Cramer E R A, et al.2010. Synchrony does not explain extrapair paternity rate variation in northern or southern house wrens. Behavioral Ecology, 21(4): 773-780.
    Lebigre C, Arcese P, Reid J M. 2013. Decomposing variation in male reproductive success: age-specific variances and covariances through extra-pair and within-pair reproduction.Journal of Animal Ecology, 82(4): 872-883.
    Lee J W. 2012. Females may not obtain indirect genetic benefits from extra-pair paternity in vinous-throated parrotbills, Paradoxornis webbianus. Journal of ethology, 30(1): 53-59.
    Lee P L M, Hays G C. 2004. Polyandry in a marine turtle: females make the best of a bad job. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the USA,101(17): 6530-6535.
    Lopes I F, Mi?o C I, Rocha C D,et al. 2013. Inferred kinship patterns reveal low levels of extra-pair paternity in the endangered Neotropical Jabiru Stork (Jabiru mycteria,Aves:Ciconiiformes). Genetica, 141(4-6): 195-203.
    Lyanne B, Barr I, Van De Pol M, et al. 2010. MHC-dependent survival in a wild population: evidence for hidden genetic benefits gained through extra-pair fertilizations.Molecular Ecology, 19(16): 3444-3455.
    Magrath M J L, Vedder O, van der Velde M, et al. 2009. Maternal Effects contribute to the superior performance of extra-pair offspring. Current Biology, 19(9): 792-797.
    Matysioková B, Cockburn A, Reme? V. 2011. Male incubation feeding in songbirds responds differently to nest predation risk across hemispheres. Animal Behaviour, 82(6): 1347-1356.
    Matysioková B, Reme? V. 2013. Faithful females receive more help: the extent of male parental care during incubation in relation to extra-pair paternity in songbirds. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26(1): 155-162.
    Mayer C, Pasinelli G. 2013. New support for an old hypothesis: density affects extrapair paternity. Ecology and Evolution,3(3): 694-705.
    Mays H L, Hill G E. 2004. Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends in Ecology Evolution, 19(10): 554-559.
    Mckinney F, Evarts S.1998. Sexual coercion in waterfowl and other birds. Ornithological Monographs, 49: 163-195.
    Milinski, M. 2006. The major histocompatibility complex, sexual selection, and mate choice. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 37: 159-186.
    Moller A P, Ninni P. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection: a meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 43(6): 345-358.
    Mulard H, Danchin E, Talbot S L, et al. 2009. Evidence that pairing with genetically similar mates is maladaptive in a monogamous bird. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9 :147.
    Neff B D, Pitcher T E. 2005. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Molecular Ecology, 14(1): 19-38.
    Petrie M, Kempenaers B. 1998. Extra-pair paternity in birds: explaining variation between species and populations. Trends in Ecology Evolution, 13(2): 52-58.
    Promerová M,Vinkler M, Bryja J, et al. 2011. Occurrence of extra-pair paternity is connected to social male's MHC-variability in the scarlet rosefinch Carpodacus erythrinus . Journal of Avian Biology, 42(1): 5-10.
    Pryke S R, Rollins L A, Griffith S C. 2011. Females use multiple mating and genetically loaded sperm competition to target compatible genes. Science, 329(5994) : 964-967.
    Puurtinen M, Ketola T, Kotiaho J S. 2009. The good-genes and compatible-genes benefits of mate choice. The American Naturalist, 174(5): 741-752.
    Queller D C. 1997. Why do females care more than males?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 264(1388): 1555-1557.
    Quillfeldt P, Masello J F, Segelbacher G . 2012. Extra-pair paternity in seabirds: a review and case study of Thin-billed prions Pachyptila belcheri. Journal of Ornithology, 153(2): 367-373.
    Reid J M, Arcese P, Sardell R J, et al. 2011. Additive genetic variance, heritability and inbreeding depression in male extra-pair reproductive success. The American Naturalist, 177(2): 177-187.
    Reid J M, Arcese P, Sardell R J, et al. 2011. Heritability of female extra-pair paternity rate in song sparrows (Melospiza melodia). Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 278(1708): 1114-1120.
    Reid J M, Sardell R J. 2012. Indirect selection on female extra-pair reproduction?extra-pair and within-pair offspring Comparing the additive genetic value of maternal half-sib extra-pair and within-pair offspring. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279(1734): 1700-1708.
    Reynolds J D, Goodwin N B, Freckleton R P. 2002. Evolutionary transitions in parental care and live bearing in vertebrates. Philosophical Transactions the Royal Society B, 357(1419) : 269-281.
    Richardson D S, Komdeur J, Burke T, et al. 2005. MHC-based patterns of social and extra-pair mate choice in the Seychelles warbler. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272(1564): 759-767.
    Rodríguez-Mu?oz R, Tregenza T. 2009. Genetic compatibility and hatching success in the sea lamprey ( Petromyzon marinus). Biology Letters, 5(2): 286-288.
    Ryder T B, Fleischer R C, Shriver W G, et al. 2012. The ecological-evolutionary interplay: density-dependent sexual selection in a migratory songbird. Ecology and Evolution, 2(5): 976-987.
    Sardell R J, Arcese P, Reid J M. 2012. Offspring fitness varies with parental extra-pair status in song sparrows,Melospiza melodia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279(1744): 4078-4086.
    Schlicht L, Girg A, Lo?s P, et al. 2012. Male extrapair nestlings fledge first. Animal Behaviour, 83(6): 1335-1343.
    Schwagmeyer P L, Clair S, Moodie R C, et al.1999. Species differences in male parental care in birds: a reexamination of correlates with paternity. The Auk, 116(2) : 487-503.
    Schwensow N, Fietz J, Dausmann K, et al. 2008. MHC-associated mating strategies and the importance of overall genetic diversity in an obligate pair-living primate. Evolutionary Ecology, 22(5): 617-636.
    Sheldon B C. 2002. Relating paternity to paternal care.Philosophical Transactions the Royal Society B, 357(1419): 341-350.
    Smuts B B, Smuts R W. 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 22: 1-63.
    Spottiswoode C, M?ller A P. 2004. Genetic similarity and hatching success in birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 271(1536): 267-272 .
    Stapleton M K, Kleven O, Lifjeld J T, et al. 2007. Female tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) increase offspring heterozygosity through extrapair mating. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61(11): 1725-1733.
    Stewart S L M, Westneat D F, Ritchison G. 2010. Extra-pair paternity in eastern bluebirds: effects of manipulated density and natural patterns of breeding synchrony. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 64(3): 463-473.
    Stow A J, Sunnucks P. 2004. Inbreeding avoidance in Cunningham's skinks(Egernia cunninghami) in natural and fragmented habitat. Molecular Ecology, 13(2): 443-447.
    Stutchbury B J M, Morton E S. 2008. Recent advances in the behavioral ecology of tropical birds: the 2005 Margaret Morse Nice lecture. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 120(1): 26-37.
    Suter S M, Keiser M, Feignoux R, et al. 2007. Reed bunting females increase fitness through extra-pair mating with genetically dissimilar males. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 274(1627): 2865-2871.
    Székely Tá, Thomas G H ,Cuthill I C. 2006. Sexual conflict,ecology, and breeding systems in shorebirds. Bioscience, 56(10): 801-808.
    Tarvin K A , Webster M S, Tuttle E M, et al. 2005. Genetic similarity of social mates predicts the level of extra-pair paternity in splendid fairy-wrens.Animal Behaviour , 70(4): 945-955.
    Tho? M, Ilmonen P, Musolf K, et al. 2011. Major histocompatibility complex heterozygosity enhances reproductive success. Molecular Ecology, 20(7): 1546-1557.
    Thuman K A, Griffith S C. 2005. Genetic similarity and the nonrandom distribution of paternity in a genetically highly polyandrous shorebird. Animal Behaviour, 69(4): 765-770.
    Tregenza T, Wedell N. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review. Molecular Ecology, 9(8): 1013-1027.
    Tschirren B, Postma E, Rutstein A N, et al. 2012. When mothers make sons sexy: maternal effects contribute to the increased sexual attractiveness of extra-pair offspring.Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279(1731): 1233-1240.
    Václav R, Hoi H. 2007. Experimental manipulation of timing of breeding suggests laying order instead of breeding synchrony affects extra-pair paternity in house sparrows. Journal of ornithology, 148(4): 395-400.
    Varian-Ramos C W, Webster M S. 2012. Extrapair copulations reduce inbreeding for female red-backed fairy-wrens, Malurus melanocephalus.Animal Behaviour, 83(3): 857-864.
    Vedder O,Magrath M J L, Harts AMF, et al. 2010. Reduced extrapair paternity in response to experimental stimulation of earlier incubation onset in blue tits. Behavioral Ecology, 21: 9-15.
    Vedder O, Magrath M J L, Niehoff D L, et al. 2012. Declining extra-pair paternity with laying order associated with initial incubation behavior,but independent of final clutch size in the blue tit. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 66(4): 603-612.
    Vedder O, Magrath M JL, Velde M van der, et al. 2013. Covariance of paternity and sex with laying order explains male bias in extra-pair offspring in a wild bird population.Biology, 9(5): 1-4.
    Walsberg G E. 1983. Avian ecological energetics. Avian Biology ,7: 161-220.
    Wan D M, Chang P, Yin J X. 2013. Causes of extra-pair paternity and its inter-specific variation in socially monogamous birds.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 33(3):158-166.
    Weatherhead E C, Reinsel G C, Tiao G C, et al. 1998. Factors affecting the detection of trends: Statistical considerations and applications to environmental data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 103(D14): 17149-17161.
    Webb T J, Olson V A, Székely T, et al. 2010. Who cares? Quantifying the evolution of division of parental effort. Ecology and Evolution, 1(3): 221-230.
    Westneat D F, Stewart I R K. 2003. Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates, and conflict. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematic, 34: 365-396.
    Wetzel D P, Westneat D F. 2009. Heterozygosity and extra-pair paternity:biased tests result from the use of shared markers. Molecular Ecology, 18(9): 2010-2021.
    Whittingham L A, Dunn P O. 2005. Effects of extra-pair and within-pair reproductive success on the opportunity for selection in birds.Behavioral Ecology, 16(1): 138-144.
    Whittingham L A, Dunn P O,Clotfelter E D. 2003. Parental allocation of food to nestling tree swallows: the influence of nestling behaviour, sex and paternity. Animal Behaviour, 65(6): 1203-1210.
    Wouter F D, Mulder R A. 2009. Multiple ornamentation, female breeding synchrony,and extra-pair mating success of golden whistlers( Pachycephala pectoralis). Journal of Ornithology, 150(3): 607-620.
    Yezerinac S M, Gibbs H L, Briskie JV, et al. 1999. Extrapair paternity in a far northern population of yellow warblers Dendroica petechia. Journal of avian biology, 30(2): 234-237.
    Zeh JA, Zeh D W. 1996. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 263(1377): 1711-1717.
    Zeh JA, Zeh D W. 1997. The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defenses against genetic incompatibility. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 264(1378): 69-75.
    倪喜军, 郑光美, 张正旺. 2001. 鸟类婚配制度的生态学分类. 动物学杂志, 36(1): 47-54.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

郝思佳,万冬梅,鞠静.2014.社会性单配制鸟类婚外父权的发生和影响因素.动物学杂志,49(6):938-951.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:3449
  • 下载次数: 3152
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-24
  • 最后修改日期:2014-10-20
  • 录用日期:2014-10-16
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-11-06