中华蟾蜍体重及脏器大小对禁食和重喂食处理的响应
作者:
作者单位:

安徽农业大学动物科技学院 合肥 230036,安徽农业大学动物科技学院 合肥 230036,安徽农业大学动物科技学院 合肥 230036,安徽农业大学动物科技学院 合肥 230036,安徽农业大学动物科技学院 合肥 230036,安徽农业大学动物科技学院 合肥 230036,安徽农业大学动物科技学院 合肥 230036

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 31170379),安徽农业大学大学生科技创新创业训练计划“创新训练”项目(No. XJ2015170,XJ2015177)


Body Mass and Internal Organ Size Response to Fasting and Refeeding Treatments in Asiatic Toads (Bufo gargarizans)
Author:
Affiliation:

College of Animal Science and Technology,Anhui Agricultural University,College of Animal Science and Technology,Anhui Agricultural University,College of Animal Science and Technology,Anhui Agricultural University,College of Animal Science and Technology,Anhui Agricultural University,College of Animal Science and Technology,Anhui Agricultural University,College of Animal Science and Technology,Anhui Agricultural University,College of Animal Science and Technology,Anhui Agricultural University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [28]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    两栖动物的体重和内脏器官大小可随环境条件而变化,具有表型可塑性,但实验例证较少,尤其缺乏与可变的食物可利用性有关的研究。本研究以捕自安徽省定远县县郊的雌、雄中华蟾蜍(Bufo gargarizans)为研究对象,测定了自由取食组、禁食1周组、禁食2周组、重喂食1周组和重喂食2周组其体重、内脏器官湿重和干重的变化情况。1)中华蟾蜍的体重、胴体湿重和干重均无明显的性别(P > 0.05)和组间(P > 0.05)差异。2)雌蟾胃的湿重、干重和大肠湿重高于雄蟾(P < 0.05),其他内脏器官(小肠、胸腺、心、肝、肺、脂肪体、脾和肾)的湿重和干重均无性别差异(P > 0.05);雄蟾上述指标均无组间差异(P > 0.05);雌蟾的胃湿重和大肠湿重均无组间差异(P > 0.05),但胃干重自由取食组高于重喂食1周组(P < 0.05)。禁食2周组的小肠湿重下降,低于自由取食组、重喂食1周和2周组(P < 0.05)。3)禁食1周组的心湿重高于重喂食2周组(P < 0.05)。结果表明,中华蟾蜍在整体水平不受短期禁食和重喂食处理的影响,器官水平可能主要依赖适度饥饿而导致的心肌功能的提升和消化道的可塑性来应对变化的食物条件。

    Abstract:

    The body mass and internal organ size may change with different environmental conditions and display phenotypic plasticity in amphibians. However, empirical evidence testing the theory of phenotypic plasticity is still scarce, especially for specific experiments associated with ever-changing food availability. The changes of body mass, as well as wet and dry mass of internal organs from five groups (feeding, fasting for one week, fasting for two weeks, re-feeding for one week, and re-feeding for two weeks) were measured in Asiatic Toads (Bufo gargarizans) captured at Dingyuan County, Anhui Province. Two-way ANOVA was performed to analyze the sex and group differences for body mass. Two-way ANCOVA with body mass (or carcass dry mass) as a covariate was performed to analyze the sex and group differences for carcass wet mass and dry mass as well as the wet mass and dry mass of internal organs. All values are represented as the mean ± SE, and P <0.05 was considered as the level for statistical significance. The software SPSS (13.0, USA) was used for data analysis. The results were as follows: 1) Body mass, carcass wet mass and dry mass did not show significant sex (Table 1, all P > 0.05) and group (Table 1, all P > 0.05) differences. 2) Stomach wet mass (Fig. 1a, P < 0.05) and dry (Fig. 1b, P < 0.05) mass, as well as large intestine wet mass (Fig. 1c, P < 0.05) was heavier in females than in males. However, no sex difference was observed for the wet mass (Table 2, all P > 0.05) and dry (Table 3, all P > 0.05) mass of other internal organs (small intestine, thymus, heart, liver, lung, fat body, spleen and kidney). In males, no group difference was found for stomach wet mass (Fig. 1a, P < 0.05) and dry (Fig. 1b, P < 0.05) mass, as well as large intestine wet mass (Fig. 1c, P < 0.05). In females, stomach dry mass was heavier in feeding group than that in the group re-feeding for one week (Fig. 1b, P < 0.05), but no difference was observed for the wet mass of stomach (Fig. 1a, P < 0.05) or large intestine (Fig. 1c, P < 0.05). Small intestine wet mass was greatly declined in the group fasting for two weeks, lower than that of feeding group and re-feeding groups (Fig. 1d, P < 0.05). 3) Heart wet mass in the group fasting for one week was heavier than that in the group re-feeding for two weeks (Fig. 1e, P < 0.05). These results indicate that short-term fasting and re-feeding treatments had no obvious influence on Asiatic Toads at organismal levels; Asiatic Toads may mainly rely on enhanced heart functions induced by moderate starvation and the plasticity of digestive tract at organic levels to cope with changing food availability.

    参考文献
    Cramp R L, Franklin C E. 2005a. Arousal and re-feeding rapidly restores digestive tract morphology following aestivation in green-striped burrowing frogs. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A, Molecular Integrative Physiology, 142 (4): 451 - 460.
    Cramp R L, Franklin C E, Meyer E A. 2005b. The impact of prolonged fasting during aestivation on the structure of the small intestine in the green-striped burrowing frog, Cyclorana alboguttata. Acta Zoologica, 86 (1): 13 - 24.
    Karasov W H, Martinez Del Rio C, Carviedes-Vidal E. 2011. Ecological physiology of diet and digestive systems. Annual Review of Physiology, 73: 69 - 93.
    Loveridge JP, Wither PC. 1981. Metabolism and water balance of active and cocooned African bullfrogs, Pyxicephalyus adspersus. Physiological Zoology, 1981, 54(2): 203 - 214.
    McWilliams S R, Karasov W H. 2001. Phenotypic ?exibility in digestive system structure and function in migratory birds and its ecological signi?cance. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A, Molecular Integrative Physiology, 128 (3): 579 - 593.
    Naya D E, Bozinovic F. 2004. Digestive phenotypic flexibility in post-metamorphic amphibians: studies on a model organism. Biological Research, 37 (3): 365 - 370.
    Naya D E, Farfat G, Mendez M, et al. 2005. Digestive performance in the Andean toad Bufo spinulosus: flexibility or hard-wired physiology? Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A, Molecular Integrative Physiology, 140 (2): 165 - 170.
    Naya D E, Maneyro R, Camargo A, et al. 2003. Annual changes in gut length of South American common frog (Leptodactylus ocellatus). Biociencias, 11 (1): 47 - 52.
    Naya D E, Veloso C, Bozinovic F. 2008. Physiological flexibility in the Andean lizard Liolaemus bellii: seasonal changes in energy acquisition, storage and expenditure. Journal of Comparative Physiology B-Biochemical Systemic and Environmental Physiology, 178 (8): 1007 - 1015.
    Naya D E, Veloso C, Bozinovic F. 2009a. Gut size variation among Bufo spinulosus populations along an altitudinal (and dietary) gradient. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 46 (1): 16 - 20.
    Naya D E, Veloso C, Sabat P, et al. 2009b. The effect of short- and long-term fasting on digestive and metabolic flexibility in the Andean toad, Bufo spinulosus. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 212 (14): 2167 - 2175.
    Piersma T, Drent J. 2003. Phenotypic flexibility and the evolution of organismal design. Trends in Ecology Evolution, 18 (5): 228 - 233.
    Pucek Z. 1965. Seasonal and age changes in the weight of internal organs of shrews. Acta Theriologica, 10(26): 369 - 438.
    Secor S M, Lignot J H. 2010. Morphological plasticity of vertebrate aestivation. Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology, 49: 183 - 208.
    Secor S M. 2005a. Physiology response to feeding, fasting and aestivation for anurans. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 208 (15): 2595 - 2608.
    Sector S M. 2005b. Evolutionary and cellular mechanisms regulating intestinal performance of amphibians and reptiles. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45 (2): 282 - 294.
    Starck J M. 1999. Structural ?exibility of the gastro-intestinal tract of vertebrates-implications for evolutionary morphology. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 238 (1): 87 - 101.
    Starck J M. 2005. Structural flexibility of the digestive system of tetrapods-patterns and processes at the cellular and tissue level∥Starck J M, Wang T. Physiological and Ecological Adaptations to Feeding in Vertebrates. En?eld, New Hampshire: Science Publishers, 175 - 200.
    Toloza E M, Diamond J M. 1990. Ontogenetic development of nutrient transporters in bullfrog intestine. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 258 (5): 760 - 769.
    冯照军, 王永强, 刘海侠, 等. 2003. 金线蛙冬眠前后肥满度及部分内脏器官的变化. 四川动物, 22(1): 29 - 30.
    金晨晨, 瞿康山, 张志强. 2014a. 黑斑侧褶蛙肥满度及脏器重量的性别和季节差异. 四川动物, 33(1): 106 - 112.
    金晨晨, 张志强. 2014b. 黑斑侧褶蛙消化道重量及长度的性别和季节差异. 动物学杂志, 49(2): 207 - 214.
    金晨晨. 2014. 中华蟾蜍免疫功能的性别和季节差异.合肥:安徽农业大学硕士学位论文.
    廖灏泓, 徐峰, 杨维康. 2013. 两栖爬行动物两性大小异形研究进展. 生态学杂志, 32(11): 3082 - 3093.
    卢欣. 1993. 太岳山丘陵地带中国林蛙成体的肥满度和某些器官系数的季节变化. 生态学杂志, 12(4): 33 - 35.
    吴云龙. 1965. 黑斑蛙自然冬眠时肥满度与某些内脏器官的变化. 动物学杂志, 7(3): 116 - 119.
    邹寿昌. 1985. 大蟾蜍冬眠期的肥满度及部分内脏器官的变化. 两栖爬行动物学报, 4(4): 320 - 324.
    邹寿昌. 1988. 花背蟾蜍冬眠期肥满度及部分内脏器官的变化. 四川动物, 7(3): 34 - 35.
    引证文献
    引证文献 [1]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

张莹,高慧清,王志,徐嘉,姚健,王红,张志强.2017.中华蟾蜍体重及脏器大小对禁食和重喂食处理的响应.动物学杂志,52(2):294-303.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:2205
  • 下载次数: 2174
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-16
  • 最后修改日期:2017-02-17
  • 录用日期:2017-02-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-03-09