崇明东滩冬季不同管理模式下水稻田水鸟群落特征及其生境分析
作者:
作者单位:

华东师范大学,华东师范大学,华东师范大学,华东师范大学,上海崇明东滩鸟类国家级自然保护区管理处,上海崇明东滩鸟类国家级自然保护区管理处,华东师范大学

基金项目:

上海市科委崇明专项项目(No. 12231204703)


Community Characteristics and Habitat Analysis of Wintering Waterfowls between Different Manage Patterns of Rice Paddy in Chongming Dongtan
Author:
Affiliation:

East China Normal University,East China Normal University,East China Normal University,East China Normal University,Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve,Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve,East China Normal University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [38]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    崇明东滩是亚太地区候鸟迁徙路线的重要中转站,也是上海地区促淤圈围的重点区域。水稻(Oryza sativa)田作为当地分布广泛且重点改造的人工湿地,研究其是否具有水鸟招引效果具有重要意义。本研究于2013和2014年冬季采用样方法对崇明东滩两种不同管理模式的水稻田,即2013年开始改造的传统模式水稻田和改造多年的机械化模式水稻田,进行了水鸟群落及生境因子调查,以探究不同管理模式下水稻田内生境差异,水鸟对不同生境的利用程度及其不同生境中的关键因子对水鸟分布的影响。调查期间共记录到水鸟5目7科18种1 795只次,其中传统模式水稻田记录到水鸟5目6科17种1 756只次,优势种为绿翅鸭(Anas crecca)、斑嘴鸭(A. poecilorhyncha)、鹤鹬(Tringa erythropus);机械化模式水稻田录到水鸟4目5科6种39只次,优势种为小??(Tachybaptus ruficollis)和凤头麦鸡(Vanellus vanellus)。T检验结果显示,传统模式水稻田对水鸟的招引效果(即多度和物种丰富度)显著优于机械化模式水稻田,2014年改造后传统模式水稻田的水鸟招引效果显著优于2013改造初期。多元回归分析显示,明水面面积比例是影响水稻田水鸟种类、数量分布的最重要因子。结果表明,明水面面积和适合的水位高度是影响冬季水稻田水鸟招引效果的主要因素,为提高冬季水稻田水鸟保育效果,应注重营造、维护冬季水稻田中水文条件。

    Abstract:

    Chongming Dongtan is one of the important transit points of Asia-Pacific Flyway, as well as a key coastal reclamation area in Shanghai. As a kind of artificial wetland, rice (Oryza sativa) paddy-field is widely distributed in this area and the main goal of restoration management, it′s necessary to find out whether the paddy-field is attractive to the waterfowls. In our study area, there are two different manage patterns (traditional and mechanized) of rice paddy-field. The traditional paddy-field samples region located in Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve (Fig. 1), composed of rice paddies and diversion trench, and farming in traditional manual administration with low density of cultivation. Traditional manage patterns rice paddy retained some rice and guarantee water conditions with the depth of 0.5﹣15 cm in winter. Mechanized manage pattern rice paddy sample region located in Yaoquan farm (Fig. 1), a typical coastal farmland ecosystem, managed in large scale mechanization farm mode, with high density cultivation. It is also composed of rice paddies and diversion trench. Mechanized manage pattern rice paddy-field is normally abandoned or planted as rotation in winter, with no water in rice paddies. Quadrat methods were taken to measure the differences of waterfowl diversity and habitat factor of two patterns of rice paddy in winters of 2013 and 2014, and we tried to find out which manage pattern of the rice paddy would attract more waterfowls and analyzed the environmental factors impacting the waterfowls′ distribution. During the two-year investigation, up to 1 795 waterfowl individuals were recorded, subordinated in 5 orders, 7 families and 18 species. In traditional manage pattern of paddy field, there were 1 756 waterfowl individuals subordinated in 5 orders, 6 families and 17 species, and the dominant species were Common Teal (Anas crecca), Spot-billed Duck (A. poecilorhyncha), Spotted Redshank (Tringa erythropus). In mechanized manage pattern of rice paddy, 39 waterfowl individuals were counted, subordinated in 4 orders, 5 families and 6 species, and the dominant species were Little Grebe (Tachybaptus ruficollis) and Northern Lapwing (Vanellus vanellus). T-test analysis indicated that firstly the paddy fields under traditional manage pattern performed better than another kind of fields in terms of abundance, richness of waterfowls, and secondly the paddy fields after transformation in 2014 performed better effect of waterfowl attraction than the ones in early transformation in 2013. Linear Regression (Backward Elimination) showed that the proportion of open water area being the most important factor to influence waterfowl species and abundance. Our study suggested that hydrological condition of rice fields is the main factor of attracting waterfowls in winter, and it is important for waterfowl biodiversity conservation.

    参考文献
    Balcombe C K,Anderson J T,Fortney R H,et al.2005.Aquatic macroinvertebrate assemblages in mitigated and natural wetlands.Hydrobiologia,541( 1) : 175 -188.
    Comin F A,Hurlbert S H.2012.Preface: perspectives on progress in ornitholimnology . Hydrobiologia, 697( 1) : 1-4.
    Darnell T,Smithe N.2004.Avian use of natural and created salt marsh in Texas. Waterbirds, 27:355-361.
    Elphick C S,Oring L W.1998. Winter management of Californian rice fields for waterbirds.The Journal of Applied Ecology.
    Elphick C S,Oring L W.2003.Conservation implications of flooding rice fields on winter waterbird communities . Agriculture,Ecosystems Environment,94( 1) : 17-29.
    Fraser L H,Keddy P A.2005.The World's Largest Wetlands:Ecology and onservation.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1 -10.
    Gordon D H,Gray B T,1998. Kaminski R M.Dabbling duck-habitat associations during winter in coastal South Carolina. Journal of Wildlife Management.
    Howee J,Bakewell D.1989.Shorebird Studies Manual.Kuala Lumpur.Asian Wetland Bureau Publication,143-147.
    Ledee O E,Cuthbert F J,Bolstad P V.2008.A remote sensing analysis of coastal habitat composition for a threatened shorebird, the piping plover (Charadrius melodus).Journal of Coastal Research,24(3): 719-726.
    Ludwig J A, Reynolds J F.1988.Statistical Ecology:A Primer on Methods and Computing,New York: JohnWiley Sons.
    Pielou E C.1975.Ecological Diversity,New York: Chapman Hall.
    Powell G V N.1987.Habitat us by wading birds in a subtropical estuary: implications of hydrography.The Auk,104:740-749.
    Sanchez-Hernandez C,Boyd D S,Foody G M.2007.Mapping specific habitats from remotely sensed imagery: Support vector machine and support vector data description based classification of coastal saltmarsh habitats. Ecological Informatics,2(2): 83-88.
    Taft O W,Colwell M A,Isola C R,et al. 2002.Waterbird responses to experimental drawdown: implications for the multispecies management of wetland mosaics.Journal of Applied Ecology,39(6): 987-1001.
    Walker B K,Riegl B,Dodge R E.2008.Mapping coral reef habitats in southeast Florida using a combined technique approach.Journal of Coastal Research,24(5): 1138-1150.
    Weber L M,Haig S M.1996.Shorebird use of South Carolina managed ajad natural coastal wetlands. Journal of Wildlife Management,60(1): 73-82.
    蔡友铭,袁晓.2008.上海水鸟.上海:上海科学技术出版社.
    杜荣骞.2009.生物统计学.北京:高等教育出版社.
    范学忠,张利权,袁琳,等.2011.基于空间分带的崇明东滩水鸟适宜生境的时空动态分析.生态学报,31(13):3820-3829.
    葛振鸣,王天厚,周晓,等.2006.上海崇明东滩堤内次生人工湿地鸟类冬春季生境选择的因子分析.动物学研究,27(2):144-150.
    惠鑫,马强,向余劲攻,等. 2009.崇明东滩鸻鹬类迁徙路线的环志分析.动物学杂志,03:23-29.
    衡楠楠,牛俊英,张斌,等.2011.鸻形目鸟类对南汇滨海滩涂的生境选择.复旦学报(自然科学版),50(3):296-301.
    金欣,任晓彤,彭鹤博,等.2013.崇明东滩鸟类栖息地优化区越冬水鸟的栖息地利用及影响因子.动物学杂志,05:686-692.
    刘昊.2006.人工湿地生境在水鸟保护中的作用研究——以崇明东滩地区为例.华东师范大学博士学位论文.
    刘晶,牛俊英,邹业爱,等.2015.上海浦东东滩鸟类栖息地生态修复区的水鸟群落变化.长江流域资源与环境,02:219-226.
    李志辉.2003.PASW/SPSS Statistics 中文版统计分析教程.3版.北京:电子工业出版社.
    裴恩乐,袁晓,汤臣栋,等.2012.上海地区水鸟群落结构和动态分布特征.生态学杂志,10:2599-2605.
    阮关心.2012.崇明东滩互花米草生态控制与鸟类栖息地优化工程生态效益探讨.安徽农业科学,40(23):11799-11801.
    施俊杰,张振声,张诗履,等.2005.崇明滩涂湿地的保护措施.上海建设科技,(1):28-29,37.
    王卿.2011.互花米草在上海崇明东滩的入侵历史、分布现状和扩张趋势的预测.长江流域资源与环境,(6):690-696.
    徐宏发,赵云龙.2005.上海市崇明东滩鸟类自然保护区科学考察集.北京:中国林业出版社.
    徐兴军,吕建伟,谢振丽,等.2009. 寒温带牧林交错区生境复杂度对啮齿类物种多样性的影响. 生态学报,06:2945-2952.
    杨晓婷,牛俊英,罗祖奎,等.2013.崇明东滩抛荒鱼塘的自然演替过程对水鸟群落的影响.生态学报,33(13):4050-4058.
    周慧,仲阳康,赵平,等. 2005.崇明东滩冬季水鸟生态位分析.动物学杂志,01:59-65.
    赵平,袁晓,唐思贤,等.2003.崇明东滩冬季水鸟的种类和生境偏好.动物学研究,24(5):387-391.
    张斌,袁晓,裴恩乐,等.2011.长江口滩涂围垦后水鸟群落结构的变化——以南汇东滩为例.生态学报,31(16):4599-4608
    张美,牛俊英,杨晓婷,等.2013.上海崇明东滩人工湿地冬春季水鸟的生境因子分析.长江流域资源与环境,22(7):858-864.
    张姚,谢汉宾,曾伟斌,等.2014.崇明东滩人工湿地春季水鸟群落结构及其生境分析.动物学杂志,04:490-504.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

莫英敏,谢汉宾,李贲,张伟,汤臣栋,钮栋梁,王天厚.2017.崇明东滩冬季不同管理模式下水稻田水鸟群落特征及其生境分析.动物学杂志,52(4):583-591.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1830
  • 下载次数: 2042
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-09-26
  • 最后修改日期:2017-06-18
  • 录用日期:2017-05-28
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-07-17