武汉三角湖浮游甲壳动物群落结构
作者:
作者单位:

江汉大学生命科学学院,江汉大学生命科学学院,江汉大学生命科学学院,江汉大学生命科学学院

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(No. 40901037),武汉市市属高校教研课题(No. 2014007),江汉大学学生科研项目(No. 2015zd81)


Community Structure of Planktonic Crustacean in Sanjiao Lake, Wuhan, China
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Life Sciences,Jianghan University,School of Life Sciences,Jianghan University,School of Life Sciences,Jianghan University,School of Life Sciences,Jianghan University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [37]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    三角湖是长江中下游地区典型的小型城市湖泊,近年来其富营养化趋势明显。2014年7月至2015年6月对湖中浮游甲壳动物群落及其影响因子进行了调查,旨在为湖泊污染防治和生态修复提供依据。在三角湖共采集浮游甲壳动物9科17属22种。浮游甲壳动物全年平均密度为(3.7 ± 3.6)ind/L,各月密度变化范围为0.6 ~ 13.1 ind/L,夏季和秋季密度较低,密度峰值出现在2月。浮游甲壳动物全年大部分时间(5、6月除外)以桡足类及无节幼体占优势,其比例为55.2% ~ 95.4%。浮游甲壳动物物种丰富度变化范围为6 ~ 15,平均值为10 ± 3,夏季浮游甲壳动物物种丰富度较低。浮游甲壳动物群落Simpson指数变化范围为0.76 ~ 0.90,平均值为0.80 ± 0.04。Pearson相关分析表明,浮游甲壳动物总密度与水深呈显著负相关(r =﹣0.636,P < 0.05,n = 11),显示季节性的水位波动影响浮游甲壳动物密度。典范对应分析(CCA)显示,水温和透明度是影响浮游甲壳动物物种组成季节变化的主要环境因子(P < 0.05)。高密度的鲢(Hypophthalmichthys molitrix)、鳙(Aristichthys nobilis)放养引起的摄食压力可能是三角湖浮游甲壳动物密度较低的主要原因之一。

    Abstract:

    Sanjiao Lake is a representative small urban lake in the middle and upper reaches of the Yangtze River. Eutrophication has became a problem for this lake recent years. In order to understand the seasonal community structure of planktonic crustacean and environmental variables, we made a monthly survey in Sanjiao Lake from July 2014 to June 2015 (Fig. 1) to provide a basis for managing eutrophication and providing supports for the ecological restoration efforts. We got the following data: water temperature varied seasonally 10℃ in winter and 28℃ in summer; sechi disk depth 0.27 to 0.72 m; total nitrogen and total phosphorous 1.50 to 3.34 and from 0.07 to 0.58, respectively (Table 1). We identified a total of 22 species, belonging to 17 genera and 9 families of planktonic crustacean from the seasonal samples. The community included 13 species in Cladocera and 9 species in Copepoda (Table 2). The species composition showed a light similarity between summer and autumn or winter with Jaccard index ranging from 0.45 to 0.50, and a medium similarity among other seasons with Jaccard index ranging from 0.60 to 0.72 (Table 3). The density of planktonic crustacean ranged from 0.6 to 13.1 ind/L with an average density of 3.7 ± 3.6 ind/L. The lower density occurred in summer and autumn, while the peak was in February. Copepoda and nauplii dominated the community in most months except May and June, accounting for 55.2%﹣95.4% of the total density (Fig. 2). The dominant species were Cyclops vicinus, Microcyclops leuckarti, Moina irrasa, Microclops varicaricans, M. rectirostris, Diaphanosoma leuchtenbergianum and Bosmina longirostris (Fig. 3). Species richness of planktonic crustacean ranged from 6 to 15, with an average of 10 ± 3. Higher species richness occurred from late autumn to spring, while the lower value occurred in summer. Simpson index of the community ranged from 0.76 to 0.90, with an average of 0.80 ± 0.04 (Fig. 4). Pearson correlation analysis showed that the total density of planktonic crustacean had a significantly negative relationship with the water depth (r =﹣0.636, P < 0.05, n = 11), reflecting that seasonal fluctuation of water level affect the density of planktonic crustacean. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) indicated that water temperature and sechi disk depth were the key factors affecting the seasonal variation of species composition of planktonic crustacean (P < 0.05, Fig. 5). It is inferred that predator pressure from the intensive aquaculture for Silver Carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and Bighead Carp (Aristichthys nobilis) was likely responsible for the low density of planktonic crustacean community in Sanjiao Lake.

    参考文献
    Leps J, Smilauer P. 2003. Multivariate analysis of ecological data Using CANOCO. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Magurran A E. 1988. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
    Maier G. 1989. The effect of temperature on the development times of eggs,naupliar and copepodite stages of five species of cyclopoid copepods. Hydrobiologia, 184(1/2): 79–88.
    Qin B Q, Gao G, Zhu GW, et al. 2013. Lake eutrophication and its ecosystem response. Science Bulletin, 58(9): 961–970.
    Shannon C E. 1948. The mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27: 379–423.
    Stefanidis K, Papastergiadou E. 2010. Influence of hydrophyte abundance on the spatial distribution of zooplankton in selected lakes in Greece. Hydrobiologia, 656: 55–65.
    Vanni M J. 1988. Freshwater zooplankton community structure: introduction of large invertebrate predators and large herbivores to a small species community. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 45(10): 1758–1770.
    Xie P, Iwakuma T, Fujii K. 2000. Effect of Available Food and Temperature on the Growth and Reproduction of. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, 15(3): 379–388.
    陈家长, 孟顺龙, 尤洋, 等. 2009. 太湖五里湖浮游植物群落结构特征分析. 生态环境学报, 18(4): 1358–1367.
    陈立婧, 梅榛, 孔优佳, 等. 2013. 滆湖控藻网围中鲢鳙对枝角类群落结构的影响. 水产学报, 37(4): 545–555.
    陈雪梅. 1984. 温度对武汉东湖近邻剑水蚤发育及繁殖的影响. 水生生物学报, (4): 419–426.
    邓道责, 邢荣龙, 马睿, 等. 2010. 淮北采煤塌陷区小型湖泊浮游甲壳动物群落结构的季节变化. 湖泊科学, 22(4): 591–597.
    董元火, 曾长立, 吴翠. 2008. 湖北省三角湖水生植物物种多样性研究. 安徽农业科学, 36(6): 2416–2418.
    郭匿春, 马友华, 李堃, 等. 2013. 农田生态拦截沟中浮游甲壳动物群落结构研究. 水生态学杂志, 34(1): 50–58.
    国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会. 2002.水和废水监测分析方法 (第四版): 北京: 中国环境科学出版社.
    黄翠, 胡忠军, 刘其根. 2014. 淡水池塘虾蚌混养对浮游甲壳动物群落结构的影响. 上海海洋大学学报, 23(2): 186–192.
    蒋燮治, 堵南山. 1979. 中国动物志(节肢动物门 甲壳纲 淡水枝角类). 北京: 科学出版社.
    柯志新, 谢平, 过龙根, 等. 2012. 太湖梅梁湾大型控藻围栏对浮游甲壳动物群落结构的影响. 应用生态学报, 23(8): 2270–2276.
    李共国, 吴芝瑛, 虞左明. 2006. 引水和疏浚工程支配下杭州西湖浮游动物的群落变化. 生态学报, 26(10): 3508–3515.
    李海燕, 赵锦慧, 梁师英. 2010. 后官湖地区NPP的计算及分析. 安徽农业科学, 38(28): 15835–15837.
    李娟, 温周瑞, 李庚辰, 等. 2014. 太湖梅梁湾和贡湖湾浮游甲壳动物群落结构及其与环境因子的相互关系. 长江流域资源与环境, 23(s1): 81–90.
    刘宝贵, 刘霞, 吴瑶, 等. 2016. 鄱阳湖浮游甲壳动物群落结构特征. 生态学报, 36(24): 1–8.
    刘宝贵, 谭国良, 邢久生, 等. 2015. 围湖养殖对军山湖浮游甲壳动物群落结构的影响. 生态与农村环境学报, 31(1): 82–87.
    刘红, 马徐发, 熊邦喜. 2005. 武汉南湖的浮游甲壳动物. 淡水渔业, 35(5): 22–24.
    刘雪花, 赵秀侠, 高攀, 等. 2012. 安徽菜子湖浮游植物群落结构的周年变化(2010年). 湖泊科学, 24(5): 771–779.
    鲁敏, 熊飞, 刘红艳, 等. 2014. 三角湖浮游植物群落结构与水质评价. 水生态学杂志, 35(6): 61–66.
    彭建华, 刘家寿. 2003. 养殖与非养殖型大型水库间浮游甲壳动物的比较. 水生生物学报, 27(2): 170–175.
    孙颖, 舒婷婷, 李静, 等. 2012. 南京玄武湖浮游甲壳动物的水平分布及其与环境的关系. 湖泊科学, 24(3): 422–428.
    王松波, 薛庆举, 高光, 等. 2011. 新疆博斯腾湖浮游甲壳动物群落结构. 湖泊科学, 23(6): 926–933.
    王颖, 杨桂军, 秦伯强, 等. 2014. 太湖不同生态类型湖区浮游甲壳动物群落结构季节变化比较. 湖泊科学, 26(5): 743–750.
    谢钦铭, 李长春. 1998. 鄱阳湖桡足类的群落组成与现存量季节变化的初步研究. 江西科学, (3): 180–187.
    徐梅, 吴芳仪, 刘靓靓, 等. 2016. 焦岗湖浮游甲壳动物群落结构的季节动态. 生态学杂志, 35(5): 1254–1262.
    薛俊增, 堵南山. 2009. 甲壳动物学. 上海: 上海教育出版社.
    杨程, 马剑敏. 2014. 城市湖泊生态修复及水生植物群落构建研究进展. 长江科学院院报, 31(7): 13–20.
    易磊, 刘存歧, 邢晓光, 等. 2010. 白洋淀浮游甲壳动物的生物多样性研究. 水生态学杂志, 3(4): 41–46.
    张晓燕, 张笑君, 林秋奇, 等. 2014. 一座热带中型水库浮游甲壳动物种类多样性与群落结构季节变化. 生态科学, 33(5): 998–1004.
    中国科学院动物研究所甲壳动物研究组. 1979. 中国动物志(节肢动物门 甲壳纲 淡水桡足类). 北京: 科学出版社.
    引证文献
    引证文献 [1]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

陈星,熊飞,刘红艳,张繁荣.2017.武汉三角湖浮游甲壳动物群落结构.动物学杂志,52(5):824-834.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1941
  • 下载次数: 2133
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-10
  • 最后修改日期:2017-08-29
  • 录用日期:2017-08-16
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-09-12