湖南壶瓶山国家级自然保护区两栖 爬行动物多样性的时空格局
作者:
作者单位:

① 中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所 北京 100091;② 湖南省壶瓶山国家级自然保护区管理局 常德 415300; ③ 东北林业大学野生动物与自然保护地学院 哈尔滨 150040

基金项目:

中国林业科学研究院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金重点项目(No. CAFYBB2018ZD001)


Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Amphibian and Reptile Diversity in Hupingshan National Nature Reserve
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Institute of Forest Ecological Environment and Protection, China Forest Science Academy;2.Administration Bureau of Hunan Hupingshan National Nature Reserve

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [1]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    本研究利用2013至2016年湖南壶瓶山国家级自然保护区巡护监测数据,评估壶瓶山保护区两栖爬行动物多样性水平。壶瓶山保护区在8个监测站点布设了25条两栖爬行动物调查样线,进行常规监测,其中,日间样线14条,夜间样线11条,日间样线平均长度4 km,夜间样线平均长度0.75 km。每个月,每条样线平均调查3次。4年共调查到62种两栖爬行动物,占湖南省两栖爬行动物总种数的38.04%。逐月计算各监测站点的alpha多样性指数和整个保护区的beta多样性指数,按季节比较不同站点间物种组成的Hellinger距离。结果显示,保护区不同位置间、不同的监测站点间以及年际间的两栖爬行动物多样性没有显著差异,提示保护区环境具有相对稳定性。但是,个别位于实验区或邻近实验区的站点,物种组成有着剧烈的波动,表明人为活动影响了两栖爬行动物的分布。另外,保护区两栖爬行动物的物种组成与多样性有着显著的季节差异,这与两栖爬行动物的生物学特性有关。以上结果说明,壶瓶山保护区两栖爬行动物的多样性结构具有稳定性和敏感性的特点,可以考虑用作保护区生物多样性水平的监测指标。

    Abstract:

    Our study showed visible spatial and temporal patterns of amphibian and reptile diversity in Hupingshan National Nature Reserve. The patrolling and monitoring data from 2013 to 2016 was used to assess amphibian and reptile diversity of Hunan Hupingshan National Nature Reserve. In order to carry out routine monitoring, Hupingshan Reserve set 25 amphibian and reptile investigating transects at 8 monitoring stations, including 14 daytime transects with an average length of 4 km and 11 nighttime transects with an average length of 0.75 km (Fig. 1). Each transect was investigated 3 times per month on average. During these 4 years, 62 amphibian and reptile species were recorded in total, accounting for 38.04% of the amphibian and reptilian species in Hunan province. We calculated the alpha diversity index of each monitoring site and the beta diversity index of the whole reserve monthly and compared the Hellinger distance of species composition in different stations among seasons. And we respectively applied ANOVA to analyze significances. The results showed that there was no significant difference among amphibian and reptile diversity in different locations, monitoring stations and in different years, which means the ecological environment of reserve is relatively stable. However, species composition fluctuated drastically in several stations located in or near experimental zone of reserve, which means human activities are influential to the distribution of amphibian and reptilian species. Besides, there were significant seasonal differences in species composition and diversity of amphibians and reptiles in the reserve, which is related to the biological characteristics of amphibians and reptiles. The results above indicate that the diversity structure of amphibians and reptiles in Hupingshan Reserve is stable yet sensitive, which can be considered as a monitoring index for the biodiversity level in the reserve.

    参考文献
    Bal P, Tulloch A I, Addison P F, et al. 2018. Selecting indicator species for biodiversity management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(10): 589–598. Charney N. and Record S. 2012. “vegetarian: Jost Diversity Measures for Community Data. R package version 1.2.” [CP/OL]. [2019-02-26]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegetarian. Chisholm R A, Lim F, Yeoh Y S, et al. 2018. Species–area relationships and biodiversity loss in fragmented landscapes. Ecology Letters, 21(6): 804–813. Díaz-García J M, Pineda E, López-Barrera F, et al. 2017. Amphibian species and functional diversity as indicators of restoration success in tropical montane forest. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(11): 2569–2589. Ficetola G F, Bonardi A, Sindaco R, et al. 2013. Estimating patterns of reptile biodiversity in remote regions. Journal of Biogeography, 40(6): 1202–1211. Greenberg C H, Seiboldt T, Keyser T L, et al. 2018. Reptile and amphibian response to season of burn in an upland hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 409: 808–816. Honeycutt R K, Lowe W H, Hossack B R. 2016. Movement and survival of an amphibian in relation to sediment and culvert design. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 80(4): 761–770. Ilg C, Oertli B. 2017. Effectiveness of amphibians as biodiversity surrogates in pond conservation. Conservation Biology, 31(2): 437–445. Legendre P, Legendre L. 2012. Numerical Ecology. Netherlands: Elsevier. Moreira L F, Dorado-Rodrigues T F, Ferreira V L, et al. 2017. An inter-dependence of flood and drought: disentangling amphibian beta diversity in seasonal floodplains. Marine and Freshwater Research, 68(11): 2115–2122. Nowakowski A J, Watling J I, Thompson M E, et al. 2018. Thermal biology mediates responses of amphibians and reptiles to habitat modification. Ecology Letters, 21(3): 345–355. Oksanen J, Blanchet F G, Friendly M, et al. 2018. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5–2. [CP/OL]. [2019-02- 26]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Pielou E C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13(1): 131–144. Preston F W. 1948. The commonness, and rarity, of species. Ecology, 29(3): 254–283. Shannon C E, Weaver W. 1950. The mathematical theory of communication. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 3(9): 31–32. Siddig A A, Ellison A M, Ochs A, et al. 2016. How do ecologists select and use indicator species to monitor ecological change? Insights from 14 years of publication in Ecological Indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60: 223–230. Sillero N, Campos J, Bonardi A, et al. 2014. Updated distribution and biogeography of amphibians and reptiles of Europe. Amphibia-Reptilia, 35(1): 1–31. Thompson D M, Ligon D B, Patton J C, et al. 2017. Effects of life history requirements on the distribution of a threatened reptile. Conservation Biology, 31(2): 427–436. Tournier E, Besnard A, Tournier V, et al. 2017. Manipulating waterbody hydroperiod affects movement behaviour and occupancy dynamics in an amphibian. Freshwater Biology, 62(10): 1768–1782. Xu H, Cao M, Wu Y, et al. 2017. Optimized monitoring stations for detection of biodiversity trends in China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(8): 1959–1971. Xu W, Xiao Y, Zhang J, et al. 2017. Strengthening protected areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(7): 1601–1606. 费梁, 胡淑琴, 叶昌媛, 等. 2009. 中国动物志: 两栖纲(下卷): 无尾目. 北京: 科学出版社. 沈猷慧. 2014a. 湖南动物志: 两栖纲. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社. 沈猷慧. 2014b. 湖南动物志: 爬行纲. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社. 张国珍, 杨道德. 2004. 湖南壶瓶山国家级自然保护区科学考察报告集. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

田书荣,杨存存,蒋博文,杜静,廖庆义,李迪强.2019.湖南壶瓶山国家级自然保护区两栖 爬行动物多样性的时空格局.动物学杂志,54(6):825-834.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:1195
  • 下载次数: 1984
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-20
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-23
  • 录用日期:2019-10-18
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-12-10