嫩江下游人工林中黑线姬鼠与黑线仓鼠的消化道形态及其取食策略
作者:
基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(973)(No.2007CB109106);齐齐哈尔大学青年教师科研启动支持计划项目


Digestive Tract Morphology of Apodemus agrarius mantchuricus and Cricetulus barabensis manchuricus in the Plantation of Lower Nenjiang Valley
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [27]
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    对嫩江下游流域人工林区两同域共存优势种黑线姬鼠东北亚种(Apodemus agrarius mantchuricus)与黑线仓鼠三江平原亚种(Cricetulus barabensis manchuricus)夏季主要食物组成及消化道形态结构的适应性变化进行了比较分析。二者均以当年生植物嫩茎、叶、种子及昆虫为主要取食对象,但黑线姬鼠对茎和叶的采食频次小于黑线仓鼠,而种子、根和昆虫类在黑线姬鼠的食物中出现的频次则相对较高。与食物组成相适应,黑线仓鼠的胃、盲肠和大肠在长度及重量上均显著大于黑线姬鼠,这是黑线仓鼠对高纤维和低蛋白食物的适应性调整。研究结果表明,两种啮齿动物在长期的进化中产生了不同的食物资源利用模式,而其消化道形态结构的变化则可能是其在长期的种间竞争和进化压力下进行食物资源分享的一种功能性反应。

    Abstract:

    Food composition and tract morphology of Apodemus agrarius mantchuricus and Cricetulus barabensis manchuricus in the plantation of Lower Nenjiang Valley was examined and compared to reveal whether the two species can co-exist through resources partitioning and how the two species adjust their digestive tract morphology to co-survival under the stress of competition and lower temperature.The contents of stomach were checked and sorted as leaves,stems,flowers,roots,seeds and insects to determine the food preferences of each species.The results showed that both of the two species mainly fed on fresh stems,leaves,seeds and insects,but the frequency of stems and leaves in stomachs of C.b.manchuricus was higher than that of A.a.mantchuricus,while the frequency of seeds,roots and insects was on the other hand.Adapted to food composition,both the length and the weight of stomach,caecum and large intestine of C.b.manchuricus were significantly larger than that of A.a.mantchuricus,which was the adaptive variation of C.b.manchuricus to its food resources with higher cellulose and lower quality.There were significant interspecific differences in small intestine,the small intestine length of C.b.manchuricus was shorter while the weight was larger than that of A.a.mantchuricus.These results indicated that the two co-existed rodent species have the different food selection pattern,while the different features of digestive tract morphology are the functional response to the partitioning of food resources.

    参考文献
    [1] 李俊生,宋延龄,曾治高.7种荒漠啮齿动物食物组成与消化道长度的比较.动物学报,2003,49(2):171~178.
    [2] Brown J S.Resource ut ilizat ion and coexist ence of seed eatingrodents in sand dune habitats.Ecology,1973,54:788~797.
    [3] Brown J S.Desert rodent community struct ure:a t est of fourmechanism of coexistence.Ecological Monographs,1989,59:1~20.
    [4] Reichman O J.Relat ion of desert rodent to available resources.J Mamm,1975,56:731~751.
    [5] Gross J E,Wang Z W,Wunder B A.Eff ects of f ood qual ity andenergy needs:changes in gut morphology and capacit ies ofMicrotus ochrogaster.J Mamm,1985,66:661~667.
    [6] Dert ing T L,Bogue B A.Responses of the gut to moderateenergy demands in a small herbivore(Microtuspennsylvanicus).J Mamm,1993,74:59~68.
    [7] 王德华,王祖望.高寒地区高原鼠兔消化道形态的季节动态.动物学报,2001,47:495~501.
    [8] Pucck Z.Seasonal and age changes in the weight of internalorgans of shrews.Acta Theriol,1965,10:369~438.
    [9] Konarzewski M,Diamond J M.Evolution of basal metabolicrat es and organ masses in laboratory mice.Evoluti on,1995,49:1 239~1 248.
    [10] 廖力夫,黎唯,王诚等.灰仓鼠重要内脏器官生长指数及其变化.兽类学报,2002,22(4):299~304.
    [11] 徐金会,安书成,邰发道.棕色田鼠消化道形态变化与能量需求的关系.动物学报,2003,49(1):32~39.
    [12] Dert ing T L,Noakes E B.Seasonal changes in gut capacity inthe whit e footed mouse(Peromyscus leucopus)and meadowvole(Mi crotus pennsylvani cus).Can J Zool,1995,73:243~252.
    [13] Wang D H,Pei Y X,Yang J C,et al.Digest ive tractmorphology and food habits in six species of rodent s.FoliaZool,2003,52:51~55.
    [14] Hansson L.Geographic differences in bank vol es(Clethrionomys glareolus)in relation to ecogeographic rul esand possible demographic and nut ritive strategies.Ann ZoolFenn,1985,22:319~328.
    [15] 鲍伟东,王德华,王祖望.内蒙古库布齐沙地黑线仓鼠食物构成的季节变化.生态学杂志,2001,20:72~73.
    [16] Hammond K A,Wunder B A.Ef fect of cold t emperatures of themorphology of gastroint est inal t ract s of two Microt ine rodents.JMammal,1995,76:232~239.
    [17] Karasov W H.Digest ive plast icity in avian energetics andfeeding ecology.In:Carey C ed.Avian Energetics andNutritional Ecology.N ew York:Chapman and Hall,1996,61~84.
    [18] Hume I D.D igest ive st rategies of mammals.Acta Zool Sin,2002,48(1):1~19.
    [19] 沈丽,王勇,王等.洞庭湖不同生态类型区黑线姬鼠消化道重量和长度的季节变化.四川动物,2005,24(2):132~137.
    [20] 柳劲松,孙儒泳,王德华.三种啮齿动物的消化道形态特征.动物学杂志,2007,42(1):8~13.
    [21] 王德华,王祖望,孙儒泳.根田鼠消化道长度和重量的变化及其适应意义.兽类学报,1995,15:53~59.
    [22] 杜卫国,鲍毅新,刘季科.七种鼠科啮齿动物消化道长度和重量的比较.兽类学报,2001,21(4):264~270.
    [23] 裴艳新,王德华.哺乳动物消化道内食物滞留时间的影响因素.动物学杂志,2000,35(5):50~53.
    [24] 杜卫国,鲍毅新.社鼠和褐家鼠消化道长度和重量的季节变化.动物学报,2000,46(3):271~277.
    [25] Woodall P F.Digestive tract dimensions and body mass ofelephant shrews(Macroscelididae)and the effects of seasonand habitat.Mammalia,1987,69:537~545.
    [26] Green D A,Millar J S.Changes in gut dimensions and capacityof Peromyscus maniculatus relative to diet quality and energyneeds.Can J Zool,1987,65:2 159~2 162.
    [27] 张美文,王勇,李波等.洞庭湖区社鼠消化道长度和质量的季节变化.生态学杂志,2007,26(1):61~66.
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

徐兴军,吕建伟,谢振丽,计沈斌,周双涛,王昌河.2008.嫩江下游人工林中黑线姬鼠与黑线仓鼠的消化道形态及其取食策略.动物学杂志,43(6):131-136.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2008-04-25
  • 最后修改日期:2008-09-22