悬挂巢箱对次级洞巢鸟类选择天然洞的影响
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(No.30670293,30870318)


Influence of Nest Box Supplement on Nature Hole Selection by Secondary Cavity-nest Birds
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [31]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    于2005~2007年3~7月采用在试验样地中添加巢位(悬挂巢箱)与对照样地比较的方法,探讨悬挂巢箱是否影响天然洞的入住率,并为次级洞巢鸟类提供巢位资源,进而增加繁殖种群的数量。结果发现,无论是试验样地还是对照样地,总的入住数量年间差异不显著,种类间差异显著;天然洞之间(无论是否悬挂巢箱)的入住率差异不显著;人工巢箱与试验样地的天然洞之间的入住率差异极显著;人工巢箱与对照样地的天然洞入住率差异极显著。结果表明,人工巢箱的添加为次级洞巢鸟提供了巢位资源,大大地提高了入住率;人工巢箱的悬挂并未影响天然洞的入住率,试验样地与对照样地的天然洞的入住率没有显著区别,表明适合鸟类入住的天然洞巢位资源在次生阔叶林中,处于稳定且饱和状态。所以悬挂巢箱不影响天然洞的入住率,而且为次级洞巢鸟类补充了巢位资源,因此增加了繁殖种群的数量。

    Abstract:

    We studied the influence of providing nest boxes on the nature holes selection by secondary cavity-nest birds from March to July, 2005 to 2007 by comparing bird occupation rate between 3 experiment plots and 3 control plots. We marked all the nature holes in the 6 plots and provided 135 nest boxes the 3 experiment plots. By checking bird occupation rate in both nature holes and nest boxes, we found that 69.33%, 58.59% and 54.00% nest boxes were occupied; 5.06%, 16.52%, and 14.62% of nature holes were occupied respectively in 2005, 2006 and 2007. No any difference were detected between the three years in bird occupancy rate in both next boxes and nature holes at the experiment plot, but the bird occupation rate between nest boxes was significantly different (t =0.539, P >0.05). In addition, the occupation rate in nature holes during the year of 2005, 2006 and 2007 in 3 control plots was 8.17%, 9.60% and 12.49%, no difference with experiment plots. Our results indicated that adding nest boxes can provide more nest sites for secondary cavity-nest birds (t =0.539, P >0.05). Therefore, nest boxes provided in forest can increase of the breeding population size of the secondary cavity-nest birds.

    参考文献
    [1] Wiens J A. On understanding a non-equilibrium world: myth and reality in community patterns and processes//Strong D R, Simberloff D, Abele L G, et al. Ecological Communities: Conceptual Issues and the Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984: 439-457.
    [2] Begon M, Harpe J L, Townsend C R. Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. 3rd ed. Oxford: Black-Well Science, 1996.
    [3] Newton I. The role of food in limiting bird numbers. Ardea, 1980, 68: 11-30.
    [4] Martin T E.Food as a limit on breeding birds: a life history perspective. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1987, 18: 453-487.
    [5] Wiens J A. The Ecology of Bird Communities. Vol 1. Foundation and Patterns. London: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
    [6] Wiens J A. The Ecology of Bird Communities. Vol 2. Processes and Variation. London: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
    [7] Boutin S. Food supplementation experiments with terrestrial vertebrates: patterns, problems, and the future. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1990, 68(2): 203-220.
    [8] Brady M J, Risch T S, Dobson F S. Availability of nest sites does not limit population size of southern flying squirrels. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2001, 78(7): 1144-1149.
    [9] Newton I. The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biological Conservation, 1994, 70(3): 265-276.
    [10] Newton I. Population Limitation in Birds. London: Academic Press, 1998.
    [11] Pys H, Pys S. Nest-site limitation and density dependence of reproductive output in the common goldeneye Bucephala clangula : implications for the management of cavity-nesting birds. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 39(3): 502-510.
    [12] Sedgeley J A. Quality of cavity microclimate as a factor influencing selection of maternity roosts by a tree-dwelling bat, Chalinolobus tuberculatus , in New Zealand. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 38(2): 425-438.
    [13] Murdoch W W. Population regulation in theory and practice. Ecology, 1994, 75(2): 271-287.
    [14] Harrison S, Turchin C N. Using density-manipulation experiments to study population regulation//Capuccino N, Price P W. Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995: 131-147.
    [15] Turchin P. Population regulation: old arguments and a new synthesis//Capuccino N, Price P W. Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis. San Diego: Academic Press, 1995: 19-40.
    [16] Bednarz J C, Ripper D, Radley P M. Emerging concepts and research directions in the study of cavity-nesting birds: keystone ecological processes. The Condor, 2004, 106(1): 1-4.
    [17] 高玮, 李万超, 吕杰娣. 三种啄木鸟的生态位和竞争. 东北师大学报: 自然科学版, 1997, (1): 78-81.
    [18] 高玮, 张克勤, 姜云垒, 等. 次生阔叶林中四种啄木鸟冬季取食行为的比较研究. 吉林师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 28(3): 13-16.
    [19] 高玮. 中国东北地区鸟类及其生态学研究. 北京, 科学出版社, 2006.
    [20] 高玮. 东北地区洞巢鸟类生态学. 吉林: 吉林科学技术出版社, 2004.
    [21] 邓秋香, 高玮, 赵虹. 两种山雀巢地选择的比较研究. 吉林林学院学报, 1997, 13(3): 154-156.
    [22] 邓秋香, 周彤, 高玮. 落叶阔叶林中初级洞巢鸟在群落组织结构形成中的作用. 东北林业大学学报, 2006, 34(6): 58-60.
    [23] 张福成, 高玮. 两种山雀繁殖领域性的比较研究//中国鸟类学会,台北野鸟学会,中国野生动物保护协会.中国鸟类学研究. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1996: 348-354.
    [24] 邓文洪, 高玮, 宋晓东. 破碎化次生林斑块面积及斑块隔离对大山雀繁殖成功的影响. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(4): 527-531.
    [25] 邓文洪, 高玮, 于亚梅. 山地次生林长耳鸮对喜鹊巢址的利用. 生态学报, 2002, 22(1): 62-67.
    [26] 邓文洪, 赵匠, 高玮. 破碎化次生林斑块面积及栖息地质量对繁殖鸟类群落结构的影响. 生态学报, 2003, 23(6): 1087-1094.
    [27] 周彤, 曹长雷, 邓秋香, 等. 人工巢箱条件下大山雀(Parus maijor)的最佳窝卵数. 自然科学进展, 2007, 17(12): 1616-1621.
    [28] 王海涛, 高玮. 次级洞巢鸟对次生林天然树洞的利用. 动物学研究, 2002, 23(2): 136-140.
    [29] Wang H T, Gao W, Wan D M, et al. Nest-site characteristics and reproductive success of five species of birds breeding in natural cavities. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(7): 1376-1385.
    [30] Holmes R T, Sherry T W, Sturges F W. Bird community dynamics in a temperate deciduous forest: long-term trends at Hubbard Brook. Ecological Monographs, 1986, 56(3): 201-220.
    [31] 宋杰. 人工巢箱的制作和使用. 生物学通报, 1994, 29(4): 25-28.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

赵虹,张克勤,王海涛,邓秋香,姜云垒,JustinLIU,高玮.2011.悬挂巢箱对次级洞巢鸟类选择天然洞的影响.动物学杂志,46(4):25-31.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2010-08-02
  • 最后修改日期:2011-05-02