瓦屋山2种山雀的生态位分化和共存
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(No.30870305)


Niche Separation and Coexistence of Two Species of Tits at Wawushan
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [41]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    黑冠山雀(Parus rubidiventris)和煤山雀(P.ater)在瓦屋山同域分布,生态位相似,是潜在的竞争者。在垂直分布上,煤山雀的生态位宽度为5.237,显著高于黑冠山雀的2.792,而在水平分布和活动基质2个维度上,二者的生态位宽度值相当。尽管3个维度上2种山雀生态位重叠值均大于0.7,但是它们对3个维度上的资源利用分别存在不同的偏好和侧重。2种山雀的身体量度除了喙宽外均有极显著差异,这应该是2种山雀对环境适应的结果。这2种山雀在巢址选择上各项参数差异均不显著,表明适宜的洞巢可能是它们种间竞争的主要对象。2种山雀的种群数量可能与居留类型有关。空间生态位或食物生态位的分离及适宜的种群数量和比例是它们得以共存的几个重要因素。

    Abstract:

    Being potential rivals, the two similar tits, Rufous-vented Tit (Parus rubidiventris) and Coal Tit (P.ater) are occurred in the same habitat at the plateau of Wawushan in Sichuan, China.During the breeding seasons of 2010 and 2011, we studied the mechanism of their niche separation and coexistence.For vertical distribution, the niche width of Coal Tit (5.237) was significantly higher than that of Rufous-vented Tit (2.792), however, there was no significant difference for horizontal distribution and active matrix, with the total value of niche overlap over 0.7 in three dimensions.But the two species of tits showed preferences and focused on resource utilization of all these three dimensions.The parameters of most body’s measurements for these two tits are significantly different, except for the bill width, which might be the results from environmental adaptations.There was no significant difference for all the parameters of the nest-site selection of the two species, indicating that appropriate cavity nest sites might be their main competition factor.The population size of these two species may vary with their residence types.We suggest that the separation of spatial niche and food niche, appropriate population size and ratio might be the important factors for their coexistence.

    参考文献
    [1] Macarthur R H. Population ecology of some warblers of northeastern coniferous forests. Ecology, 1958, 39(4): 599-619.
    [2] Hill B G, Lein M R. Ecological relations of sympatric black-capped and mountain chickadees in southwestern Alberta. Condor, 1988, 90(4): 875-884.
    [3] 陈俊豪, 黄晓凤, 鲁长虎, 等. 白颈长尾雉与白鹇秋冬季空间生态位比较. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(12): 2546-2552.
    [4] Hino T, Unno A, Nakano S. Prey distribution and foraging preference for Tits. Ornithological Science, 2002, 1(1): 81-87.
    [5] Sturman W A. The foraging ecology of Parus atricapillus and P. rufescens in the breeding season, with comparisons with other species of Parus. Condor, 1968, 70(4): 309-322.
    [6] Franzreb K E. Foraging habits of Ruby-crowned and Golden-crowned Kinglets in an Arizona montane forest. Condor, 1984, 86(2): 139-145.
    [7] 高玮, 相桂权, 冯贺林, 等. 次生阔叶林中大山雀和沼泽山雀取食行为的研究. 生态学杂志, 1996, 15(5): 1-5.
    [8] 邓秋香, 高玮, 赵虹. 两种山雀巢地选择的比较研究. 吉林林学院学报, 1997, 13(2): 154-167.
    [9] Buckley N J. Interspecific competition between Vultures for preferred roost positions. The Wilson Bulletin, 1998, 110(1): 122-125.
    [10] 赵亮, 张晓爱. 角百灵和小云雀的巢址选择与竞争共存. 动物学研究, 2004, 25(3): 198-204.
    [11] 王维奎, 周材权, 龙帅, 等. 四川南充太和鹭科鸟类群落空间生态位和种间关系. 四川动物, 2008, 27(2): 178-182.
    [12] Dhondt A A. Ecological and evolutionary effects of interspecific competition in Tits. The Wilson Bulletin, 1989, 101(2): 198-216.
    [13] Slagsvold T, Wiebe K L. Learning the ecological niche. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007, 274(1606): 19-23.
    [14] Dhondt A A. Interspecific competition between Great and Blue Tit. Nature, 1977, 268(5620): 521-523.
    [15] Smith S M. An ecological study of winter flocks of Black-capped and Chestnut-backed Chickadees. The Wilson Bulletin, 1967, 79(2): 200-207.
    [16] Snow D W. The habitats of Eurasian Tits (Parus spp.). Ibis, 1954, 96(4): 565-585.
    [17] Alatalo R V. Interspecific competition in tits Parus spp. and the Goldcrest Regulus regulus: foraging shifts in multispecific flocks. Oikos, 1981, 37(3): 335-344.
    [18] Salewski V, Bairlein F, Leisler B. Niche partitioning of two Palearctic passerine migrants with Afrotropical residents in their West African winter quarters. Behavioral Ecology, 2003, 14(4): 493-502.
    [19] Richards S A, Nisbet R M, Wilson W G, et al. Grazers and diggers: exploitation competition and coexistence among foragers with different feeding strategies on a single resource. American Naturalist, 2000, 155(2): 266-279.
    [20] Schooner T W. The evolution of bill size differences among sympatric congeneric species of birds. Evolution, 1965, 19(2): 189-213.
    [21] Partridge L. Some aspects of the morphology of Blue Tits (Parus caeruleus) and Coal Tits (Parus ater) in relation to their behaviour. Journal of Zoology, 1976, 179: 121-133.
    [22] Alatalo R V, Eriksson D, Gustafsson L, et al. Exploitation competition influences the use of foraging sites by tits: experimental evidence. Ecology, 1987, 68(2): 284-290.
    [23] 约翰 ·马敬能, 卡伦 ·菲利普斯, 何芬奇. 中国鸟类野外手册. 长沙: 湖南教育出版社, 2000.
    [24] 郑光美. 中国鸟类分类与分布名录. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005: 324-325.
    [25] 吴逸群, 王修华, 陈有顺, 等. 黑冠山雀Parus rubidiventris的巢址特征与繁殖行为. 甘肃林业科技, 2007, 32(4): 1-8.
    [26] Gustafssona L. Foraging behaviour of individual Coal Tits, Parus ater, in relation to their age, sex and morphology. Animal Behaviour, 1988, 36(3): 696-704.
    [27] Gosler A G, Carruthers T D. Bill size and niche breadth in the Irish Coal Tit Parus ater hibernicus. Journal of Avian Biology, 1994, 25(3): 171-177.
    [28] Alatalo R V, Moreno J. Body size, interspecific interactions, and use of foraging sites in tits (Paridae). Ecology, 1987, 68(6): 1773-1777.
    [29] Korner-Nievergelt F, Korner-Nievergelt P, Bader E, et al. Between-species correlations in the number of migrants at Ulmethöchi (Switzerland). Journal of Ornithology, 2008, 149(4): 579-586.
    [30] 蒋迎昕, 孙悦华, 毕中霖. 四川瓦屋山金色林鸲的繁殖生态及孵卵节律. 动物学杂志, 2005, 40(2): 6-10.
    [31] Sutherland W J: 张金屯, 译. 生态学调查方法手册. 科学技术出版社, 1993.
    [32] MacArthur R H. Geographical Ecology. New York: Harper and Rowe, 1972.
    [33] Schooner T W. The anolis lizards of bimini: resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology, 1968, 49(4): 704-726.
    [34] 宋榆钧. 煤山雀繁殖与食性的研究. 生态学报, 1983, 3(4): 399-407.
    [35] Gibb J. Feeding ecology of tits, with notes on Treecreeper and Goldcrest. Ibis, 1954, 96(4): 513-543.
    [36] Partridge L. Field and laboratory observations on the foraging and feeding techniques of Blue Tits (Parus caeruleus) and Coal Tits (P.Ater) in relation to their habitats. Animal Behaviour, 1976, 24(3): 534-544.
    [37] Minot E O, Perrins C M. Interspecific interference competition-nest sites for Blue and Great Tits. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 1986, 55(1): 331-350.
    [38] Kosenko S M, Fry C H. Competition and coexistence of the European Bee-eater Merops apiaster and the Blue-cheeked Bee-eater Merops persicus in Asia. Ibis, 1998, 140(1): 2-13.
    [39] Török J , Tóth L . Asymmetric competition between two tit species: a reciprocal removal experiment. Journal of Animal Ecology, 1999, 68(2): 338-345.
    [40] 李显达, 吕晓平, 方克艰, 等. 黑龙江省嫩江高峰林区2004年度鸟类环志监测报告. 四川动物, 2006, 25(3): 570-576.
    [41] Veistola S, Lehikoinen E, Eeva T. Weather and breeding success at high latitudes—the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca and the Siberian Tit Parus cinctus. Ornis Fennica, 1997, 74(2): 89-98.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

杨小农,朱磊,郝光,温安祥,孙悦华.2012.瓦屋山2种山雀的生态位分化和共存.动物学杂志,47(4):11-18.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:3039
  • 下载次数: 3523
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2012-01-06
  • 最后修改日期:2012-02-25
  • 在线发布日期: 2012-08-16