重庆彭水发现务川臭蛙
作者:
作者单位:

1.重庆自然博物馆 重庆 400715;2.西南大学生命科学学院,三峡库区生态环境与生物资源省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地 重庆 400715;3.川渝共建古生物与古环境协同演化重庆市重点实验室 重庆 400700

作者简介:

马琦,男,副研究馆员;研究方向:动物学;E-mail:maqiswu@126.com。

中图分类号:

Q959

基金项目:

重庆市国家重点保护陆生野生动物补充调查项目(No. sxxycq-2021-086);


Odorrana wuchuanensis Found in Pengshui, Chongqing
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Chongqing Museum of Natural History, Chongqing 400715; 2.State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Eco-Environment and Bio-Resource of the Three Gorges Area, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715; 3.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Paleontology and Paleoenvironment Co-evolution (Sichuan-Chongqing Joint Construction), Chongqing 400700, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [24]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    2022年7月,在重庆市彭水苗族土家族自治县新田镇调查到2只臭蛙,经比较形态特征确认为臭蛙属(Odorrana)物种。基于线粒体16S rRNA基因片段构建的臭蛙属部分物种的贝叶斯和最大似然系统发育树显示,这2只臭蛙和模式产地贵州省务川仡佬族苗族自治县的务川臭蛙(O. wuchuanensis)聚为一支,具有较高的支持率,贝叶斯后验概率为0.99、最大似然超快速引导支持(2 000次重复)自展值为95%。综合形态特征和系统发育分析,确认此2只臭蛙为务川臭蛙,系重庆市首次记录。务川臭蛙分布范围较为狭窄,此前仅记录于贵州省务川县、沿河土家族自治县、荔波县以及湖北省建始县和广西壮族自治区环江毛南族自治县。务川臭蛙在重庆彭水的发现,确认了该物种在武陵山和大娄山脉重庆段的分布。彭水发现的务川臭蛙1雄1雌,雄性体长81.3 mm,大于模式标本的最大体长,大于湖北建始县种群雄蛙体长;雌性体长87.1 mm,在模式标本的体长范围内,小于建始县种群雌蛙体长。线粒体16S rRNA基因的遗传分化分析显示,重庆市彭水苗族土家族自治县的务川臭蛙样本和模式产地的样本没有遗传分化,遗传距离为0。务川臭蛙在重庆市的发现扩展了对该种分布区的认知,并可为物种保护研究提供基础信息。

    Abstract:

    During a field investigation in Xintian Town, Pengshui Miao, and Tujia Autonomous County, Chongqing in July 2022, two Odorrana specimens were found (Fig. 1). The purpose of this study is to identify the species using morphological and phylogenetic methods, as well as to ascertain its distribution in Chongqing.A comparative analysis of the morphological characteristics of the species discovered from Chongqing and O. wuchuanensis from Guizhou and Hubei was conducted. For phylogenetic analyses, mitochondrial 16S rRNA fragments were amplified, and the 16S rRNA gene information of 11 Odorrana species from China and abroad was obtained from the GenBank database (Table 1). Corresponding sequences of one Pseudorana weiningensis and one Nidirana daunchina were also downloaded and used as outgroups. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was constructed in IQ-TREE, the Bayesian tree construction was carried out in MrBayes 3.2.1, and the best-fit model was selected according to the Bayesian inference criteria (BIC) computed with JModelTest 0.1.1. Morphological characteristics appear to differ little between those specimens of Chongqing, Guizhou, and Hubei (Fig. 2). The snout vent length of the male species discovered in Pengshui was 81.3 mm, which was longer than the maximum snout vent length of the type specimen and O. wuchuanensis from Jianshi County, Hubei Province. The female of the species had a snout vent length of 87.1 mm, which was within the range of the type specimen’s body snout vent length but smaller than the female O. wuchuanensis from the Jianshi County (Table 2). Genetic analysis based on the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene revealed that the specimens found in Pengshui County of Chongqing clustered with O. wuchuanensis from Wuchuan County of Guizhou Province with a high support (Fig. 3). The genetic distance between O. wuchuanensis in Wuchuan County, Guizhou Province, and the specimens found in Pengshui County is 0 (Table 3). According to a thorough comparison with morphological analysis and phylogenetic analysis, the specimens discovered in Pengshui were identified as O. wuchuanensis, which is a new record of amphibian distribution in Chongqing.

    参考文献
    AmphibiaWeb, 2023. Information on Amphibian Biology and Conservation. AmphibiaWeb, Berkeley, California. [EB/OL]. [2023-04-02]. https://amphibiaweb.org/index.html.
    Bui Q M, Nguyen M A T, von Haeseler A, 2013. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30(5):1188–1195.
    Chen X H, Chen Z, Jiang J P, et al. 2013. Molecular phylogeny and diversification of the genus Odorrana (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae) inferred from two mitochondrial genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 69(3):1196–1202.
    Drummond A J, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST:Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 7(8):214.
    Frost D R. 2023. Amphibian Species of the World:An Online Reference. Version 6.1. New York, USA:American Museum of Natural History. [EB/OL]. [2023-03-30]. https:// amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/.
    Guindon S, Dufayard J F, Lefort V, et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies:Assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology, 59(3):307–321.
    Hoang D T, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, et al. 2018. UFBoot2:Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 35(2):518–522.
    Huang Y J, Zhao W, Ding L, et al. 2019. Habitat selection and genetic structure of the endangered frog species Odorrana wuchuanensis (Anura:Ranidae). Zoological Science, 36(5):402–409.
    Nguyen L T, Schmidt H A, von Haeseler A, et al. 2015. IQ-TREE:A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum- likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 32(1):268–274.
    Posada D. 2008. jModelTest:Phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 25(7):1253–1256.
    Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2:Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology, 61(3):539–542.
    Shen H J, Zhu Y J, Li Z, et al. 2020. Reevaluation of the holotype of Odorrana schmackeri Boettger, 1892 (Amphibia:Anura:Ranidae) and characterization of one cryptic species in O. schmackeri sensu lato through integrative approaches. Asian Herpetological Research, 11(4):297–311.
    Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, et al. 1994. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87(6):651–701.
    Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, et al. 2011. MEGA5:Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28(10):2731–2739.
    费梁. 2020. 中国两栖动物图鉴(野外版). 郑州:河南科学技术出版社, 1–837.
    费梁, 胡淑琴, 叶昌媛, 等. 2009. 中国动物志:两栖纲(中卷)无尾目. 北京:科学出版社, 1–957.
    费梁, 叶昌媛, 江建平. 2012. 中国两栖动物及其分布彩色图鉴. 成都:四川科学技术出版社, 1–619.
    刘健昕, 张志勇, 张著平, 等. 2009. 极度濒危的洞栖蛙类——务川臭蛙的生境和现状初报. 生物学通报, 44(5):14–16.
    刘祖尧, 王英永. 2014. 务川臭蛙分布区域扩大及其濒危等级再评估. 动物学杂志, 49(5):766–771.
    罗键, 刘颖梅, 高红英. 2012. 重庆市两栖爬行动物分类分布名录. 西南师范大学学报:自然科学版, 37(4):130–139.
    伍律, 润华, 董谦, 等. 1983. 贵州两栖类新纪录及蛙属一新种. 动物学报, 29(1):66–70.
    易建华, 甘小平, 黄自豪, 等. 2013, 重庆市发现光雾臭蛙和南江臭蛙. 动物学杂志, 48(1):125–128.
    中国两栖类. 2023. “中国两栖类”信息系统. 中国, 云南省, 昆明:中国科学院昆明动物研究所. [EB/OL]. [2023-03-30]. http://www. amphibiachina.org/.
    朱艳军, 陈卓, 常利明, 等. 2015. 重庆市发现宜章臭蛙. 动物学杂志, 50(6):969–973.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

马琦,黄静,万里鹏,侯明,袁智勇,王志坚.2023.重庆彭水发现务川臭蛙.动物学杂志,58(4):622-629.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:344
  • 下载次数: 883
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-26
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-08-18