基于卫星跟踪的长江下游丘陵地区野放獐的活动规律研究及失联案例分析
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京林业大学 南京 210037;2.南京市红山森林动物园 南京 210028

作者简介:

刘慧宇,女,硕士研究生;研究方向:野生动物生态与保护;E-mail:1661393768@qq.com。

基金项目:

2023年江苏省研究生科研创新计划项目(No. KYCX23_1116);


Case Study of Activities and Lost Contact of Wild Released Water Deer in the Hilly Areas of the Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Based on Satellite Tracking
Author:
Affiliation:

1.Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037; 2.Nanjing Hongshan Forest Zoo, Nanjing 210028, China

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [32]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    獐(Hydropotes inermis)是国家二级重点保护野生动物,将人工饲养的獐野外放归有助于恢复野外种群数量。本研究在长江下游宁镇丘陵宝华山地区,分别于2022年10月和11月共放归14只獐,其中6只佩戴卫星跟踪器,2023年5月放归2只佩戴卫星跟踪器个体,共野化放归了16只人工饲养獐。对野放后獐的活动规律、海拔以及活动范围进行了跟踪研究。研究结果显示:截止2023年11月末,跟踪的8只个体有7只停止返回信号,1只仍有正常活动,实地搜索停止返回信号的跟踪器,发现2只个体的尸体和另一个体的跟踪器,4只失联原因不明。野放獐整体活动高峰期出现在3:00 ~ 6:00时段和15:00 ~ 18:00时段,在9:00 ~ 12:00时段的活动量最低;野放獐活动的海拔范围在100 ~ 150 m,并不到海拔较高的区域活动;不同季节野放獐活动范围面积大小不同,春季(0.693 ± 0.220)km2、夏季(0.557 ± 0.170)km2、秋季(0.473 ± 0.036)km2、冬季(0. 639 ± 0.118)km2;野放獐繁殖期活动范围面积为(0.676 ± 0.193)km2,非繁殖期活动范围面积为(0.562 ± 0.073)km2,繁殖期与非繁殖期之间的活动范围面积不存在显著差异。从野放效果来看,虽然在野放工作前开展了必要的准备工作,如检查动物的身体状况以判断是否达到野放标准,并进行了一定时期的野化训练以帮助其适应野外生活,但是野放成功率依然较低。因此,獐的野放不仅需要选择适宜的野放季节和地点,还要充分评估野放地点的隐蔽条件和人为干扰程度等影响因子,并要加强管理与保护力度,减少人为干扰,以提高其成活率。

    Abstract:

    [Objectives] Hydropotes inermis is a national second-class protected wild animal. Releasing captive-bred H. inermis into the wild can help restore wild populations. To study the activity patterns, altitude preferences, and home range of wild released H. inermis, we reintroduced 16 captive-bred individuals into Baohua Mountain in the Ningzhen Hills along the lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Fourteen of these H. inermis (six equipped with satellite trackers) were released in October and November 2022, and two (both with satellite trackers) in May 2023. [Methods] Data on positioning times and activity levels were organized and summarized, creating daily activity rhythm charts for the H. inermis, and a normality test was conducted using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov method. The significance of differences in daily activity rhythms across different seasons was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The latitude and longitude data were imported into ArcGIS to calculate the elevation of each point, and the activity range maps were generated using R software and imported into ArcGIS for area calculation. The significance of differences among seasonal activity range areas was analyzed using one-way ANOVA, and the difference between breeding and non-breeding periods was examined using independent sample t-tests. [Results] From the initial release on October 13, 2022, to November 24, 2023, only one H. inermis individual continued to transmit signals, while 7 ind had stopped sending signals. Among those 7 ind, the dead bodies of 2 ind and the tracker of another were found, and 4 ind were missing (Table 2). The overall activity peaks for H. inermis in Baohua Mountain occurred between 03:00﹣06:00 and 15:00﹣18:00, with the lowest level of activity observed between 09:00﹣12:00 (Fig. 2). The elevation range of the wild released H. inermis was between 100 and 150 m, with no individual venturing into higher elevations (Fig. 4). The home range area varied by season, with average area was 0.693 ± 0.220 km2 in spring, 0.557 ± 0.170 km2 in summer, 0.473 ± 0.036 km2 in autumn, and 0.639 ± 0.118 km2 in winter. The average home range area during the breeding period was 0.676 ± 0.193 km2, compared to 0.562 ± 0.073 km2 during the non-breeding period (Fig. 5), although no significant difference between the two periods was found. Analysis of the missing individuals indicated that human disturbance was a major cause of mortality, posing a significant threat to the survival of H. inermis. [Conclusion] Despite necessary preparations before the wild release, such as health checks to ensure the animals met release standards and a period of rewilding training to help them adapt to the wild, were carried out, the success rate of the wild release was still low. Therefore, the release of H. inermis requires not only the selection of suitable seasons and locations for release, but also a thorough assessment of factors such as concealment conditions and the degree of human disturbance at the release sites. Management and protection efforts also need to be strengthened to reduce human interference and improve survival rates.

    参考文献
    Batson W G, Gordon I J, Fletcher D B, et al. 2015. Translocation tactics:a framework to support the IUCN Guidelines for wildlife translocations and improve the quality of applied methods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52(6):1598–1607.
    Batson W G, Gordon I J, Fletcher D B, et al. 2017. The effect of pre-release captivity on the stress physiology of a reintroduced population of wild eastern bettongs. Journal of Zoology, 303(4):311–319.
    Berger-Tal O, Blumstein D T, Swaisgood R R. 2020. Conservation translocations:a review of common difficulties and promising directions. Animal Conservation, 23(2):121–131.
    Bergerud A T. 1974. Decline of caribou in North America following settlement. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 38(4):757.
    Butler A R, Bly K L S, Harris H, et al. 2020. Home range size and resource use by swift foxes in northeastern Montana. Journal of Mammalogy, 101(3):684–696.
    Champagnon J, Guillemain M, Elmberg J, et al. 2012. Low survival after release into the wild:assessing “the burden of captivity” on Mallard physiology and behaviour. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 58(1):255–267.
    Hasapes S K, Comer C E. 2016. Adult white-tailed deer seasonal home range and habitat composition in northwest Louisiana. Journal of the Southeast Association Fish Wildlife Agencies, 3:243–252.
    IUCN 2023.The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. [DB/OL]. [2023-12-15]. https://www.iucnredlist.org/.
    Kirkwood J K. 2013. Guidelines for reintroductions and other conservation translocations. Animal Welfare, 22(4):489–490.
    Lang S D J, Mann R P, Farine D R. 2019. Temporal activity patterns of predators and prey across broad geographic scales. Behavioral Ecology, 30(1):172–180.
    Li Y, Wang H Y, Jiang Z G, et al. 2022. Seasonal differences of the Milu’s home range at the early rewilding stage in Dongting Lake Area, China. Global Ecology and Conservation, 35:e02057.
    Mazerolle D F, Hobson K A. 2004. Territory size and overlap in male Ovenbirds:contrasting a fragmented and contiguous boreal forest. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 82(11):1774–1781.
    Rusak B, Zucker I. 1975. Biological rhythms and animal behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 26:137–171.
    Seddon P J, Griffiths C J, Soorae P S, et al. 2014. Reversing defaunation:restoring species in a changing world. Science, 345(6195):406–412.
    Viana D S, Granados J E, Fandos P, et al. 2018. Linking seasonal home range size with habitat selection and movement in a mountain ungulate. Movement Ecology, 6:1.
    陈国远, 王成, 陈浩, 等. 2023. 盐城滨海湿地獐栖息地选择的季节变化. 应用生态学报, 34(2):510–518.
    陈浩, 王刚, 王成, 等. 2024. 野化放归丹顶鹤活动节律、家域特征和栖息地选择. 生态学报, 44(4):1526–1538.
    陈珉, 张恩迪, 杨乃乙, 等. 2009. 江苏省盐城滨海湿地獐的春季种群数量与分布. 湿地科学, 7(1):1–4.
    韩茜, 梁涛, 张曼玉, 等. 2022. 基于红外相机技术的秋冬季城市森林公园獐的活动节律分析和生境选择. 生态学杂志, 41(5):963–972.
    何鑫, 裴恩乐, 袁晓, 等. 2016. 上海地区重引入獐野放后的活动规律. 动物学杂志, 51(1):1–13.
    江辉龙, 周绍春, 张明海, 等. 2023. 同域分布的野猪与狍活动节律及与月光周期的关系. 生态学报, 43(8):3128–3136.
    李言阔, 单继红, 李佳, 等. 2013. 獐(Hydropotes inermis)生态学研究进展. 野生动物, 34(5):270–273.
    李耀宇, 陈昕旸, 赵闪闪, 等. 2023. 野外放归华南梅花鹿活动节律与家域特征. 兽类学报, 43(5):501–512.
    林杰, 徐文轩, 杨维康, 等. 2012. 卡拉麦里山有蹄类自然保护区蒙古野驴生境适宜性评价. 生物多样性, 20(4):411–419.
    刘姝, 初红军, 王渊, 等. 2013. 普氏野马(Equus przewalskii)重引入区域的社区保护意识调查分析. 干旱区研究, 30(1):135–143.
    马飞雁, 余晓俊, 陈珉, 等. 2013. 圈养獐春夏季昼间行为时间分配及活动节律. 兽类学报, 33(1):28–34.
    盛和林. 1992. 中国鹿类动物. 上海:华东师范大学出版社, 96–116.
    夏昕, 任静, 李立, 等. 2021. 洞庭湖区麋鹿再野化初期秋冬季生境选择. 生物多样性, 29(8):1087–1096.
    肖兵, 盛和林. 1990. 鄱阳湖獐(Hydropotes inermis)家域和活动节律的研究. 华东师范大学学报:哺乳动物生态学专辑, (9):27–36.
    张恩迪, 滕丽微, 吴咏蓓. 2006. 江苏盐城保护区獐的栖息地选择. 兽类学报, 26(1):49–53.
    张娜. 2019. 鄱阳湖湿地枯水期獐(Hydropotes inermis)野放初期的家域和生境选择. 南昌:江西师范大学硕士学位论文.
    张晓晨, 杨国栋, 陈昕, 等. 2019. 江苏宝华山植物群落结构及其环境解释. 植物资源与环境学报, 28(4):77–83.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘慧宇,李梅荣,陈蓉,陈月龙,胡心怡,胡华丽,武大伟,鲁长虎.2024.基于卫星跟踪的长江下游丘陵地区野放獐的活动规律研究及失联案例分析.动物学杂志,59(6):897-907.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:104
  • 下载次数: 368
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-12
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-12-19