生境因子对海南五指山白鹇和红原鸡分布的影响
作者:
作者单位:

1.海南热带雨林国家公园管理局五指山分局 五指山 572299;2.海南大学生态与环境学院 海口 570228;3.海南大学林学院 海口 570228

基金项目:

海南省自然科学基金项目(No. 320RC506),2021年生态保护与恢复——动物多样性监测项目

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [1]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解白鹇(Lophura nycthemera)whiteheadi亚种与红原鸡(Gallus gallus)jabouillei亚种的生境选择。利用2018年9月至2020年9月在海南热带雨林国家公园五指山片区东北部获得的红外相机数据,分析生境因子对同域分布的白鹇和红原鸡分布的影响。结果显示,白鹇偏好低地雨林和山地雨林,红原鸡偏好次生林和低地雨林;白鹇分布的海拔、坡向较均匀;红原鸡分布海拔呈单峰,旱季分布海拔峰值575.8 m,雨季分布海拔峰值497.7 m,偏好阳坡;白鹇坡度选择呈双峰型,旱季其选择坡度峰值为19.7°和34.5°,雨季峰值为20.1°和34.3°;红原鸡旱季选择坡度呈单峰,峰值35.7°,雨季呈双峰,峰值12.5°和35.1°;白鹇和红原鸡二者温度选择均呈单峰型,旱季二者峰值均为20.3 ℃,雨季白鹇峰值为22.2 ℃,红原鸡峰值为26.1 ℃。两物种海拔的生态位重叠度最低,旱季和雨季,二者海拔因子上的生态位重叠度分别为0.375 1和0.353 2,温度和坡向的生态位重叠度较高。本研究结果表明,白鹇的环境适应性优于红原鸡,二者主要通过对海拔的选择来实现生态位分化,其他环境因子中也存在不同程度的分化特征。

    Abstract:

    [Objectives] The Silver Pheasant (Lophura nycthemera whiteheadi) and Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus jabouillei) are two Galliformes birds distributed in the Wuzhishan of Hainan Province. The present study aims to reveal the effects of habitat factors on the distribution of these two sympatric birds. [Methods] We set up 50 infrared cameras and obtained data from September 2018 to September 2020 in the northeast of Wuzhishan of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park (see Fig. 1). The chi-square goodness of fit test was used to analyze the influence of the number of infrared camera monitoring points on the observation value, Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the differences in resource utilization between species and within different seasons, and Friedman test was used to analyze the difference of vegetation resource utilization among species. Niche breadth and niche overlap were calculated using "shannon" and "morisita" of the Spaa package in R 4.1.1. [Results] The results showed that there were significant differences in the utilization of various types of vegetation resources between two species in different seasons (c2 = 76.324, df = 4, P < 0.05). The Silver Pheasant preferred tropical lowland rainforest and tropical montane rainforest, while the Red Junglefowl preferred secondary forest and tropical lowland rainforest (Table 1). There were significant differences in altitude distribution between the two species in dry season (U = 11 507.00, Z =﹣4.588, P < 0.05) and rainy season (U = 15 199,00, Z =﹣7.739, P < 0.05). The Red Junglefowl had a single peak altitude distribution, with a peak of 575.8 m in the dry season and 497.7 m in the rainy season and preferred sunny slopes (Fig. 2). In dry season, the slope distribution of the two species was significantly different (U = 12 414.00, Z =﹣3.743, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in slope distribution between the two species in rainy season (U = 26 030.00, Z =﹣0.556, P > 0.05). The peak slopes of the Silver Pheasant were 19.7° and 34.5° in the dry season, and the peaks slopes were 20.1° and 34.3° in the rainy season. As to the Red Junglefowl, there was a single peak in the dry season of 35.7°, with double peaks in the rainy season of 12.5° and 35.0° (Fig. 4). During dry season, there was no significant difference in the aspect distribution of the two species (U = 15 678.50, Z =﹣0.688, P > 0.05). In the rainy season, the aspect distribution of the two species was significantly different (U = 22 060.00, Z =﹣3.296, P < 0.05), the Silver Pheasant was evenly distributed in the slope direction, and the Red Junglefowl mainly moved on the sunny slope (Fig. 5). There was significant difference in temperature selection of the two species in dry season (U = 12 088.00, Z =﹣4.042, P < 0.05) and rainy season (U = 19 478.50, Z=﹣4.900, P < 0.05). The temperature selections of the two species were both unimodal, with peaks both at 20.3 ℃ in dry season, and 22.2 ℃ of Silver Pheasant, 26.1 ℃ of Red Junglefowl in rainy season (Fig. 3). The niche overlap of the two species at altitude was the lowest (0.375 in the dry season and 0.353 in the rainy season), and being higher in temperature and slope (Table 2). [Conclusion] Our results indicated that the environmental adaptability of Silver Pheasant being better than that of Red Junglefowl. Niche differentiation of Silver Pheasant and Red Junglefowl can be realized mainly through the choice of altitude. There are also different degrees of differentiation characteristics in other environmental factors.

    参考文献
    Lack D. 1933. Habitat selection in birds: with special reference to the effects of afforestation on the Breckland avifauna. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2(2): 239–262. Lush L, Ward A I, Wheeler P. 2017. Dietary niche partitioning between sympatric brown hares and rabbits. Journal of Zoology, 303(1): 36–45. Nishida T, Rerkamnuaychoke W, Tung D G, et al. 2000. Morphological identification and ecology of the Red Jungle Fowl in Thailand, Laos and Vietnam. Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, 71(5): 470–480. Pasinelli G. 2007. Nest site selection in middle and great spotted woodpeckers Dendrocopos medius & D. major: implications for forest management and conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 16(4): 1283–1298. Schoener T W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185(4145): 27–39. Welbourne D J, Claridge A W, Paull D J, et al. 2016. How do passive infrared triggered camera traps operate and why does it matter? Breaking down common misconceptions. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 2(2): 77–83. 陈北光, 苏志尧. 1995. 广东八宝山常绿阔叶林物种多样性分析. 华南农业大学学报, 16(4): 32–36. 陈俊豪, 黄晓凤, 鲁长虎, 等. 2009. 白颈长尾雉与白鹇秋冬季空间生态位比较. 生态学杂志, 28(12): 2546–2552. 陈启荣, 李道劲. 2003. 红原鸡演化中心地与驯养始源地的探究 // 中国畜牧兽医学会. 家禽研究最新进展——第十一次全国家禽学术讨论会论文集. 长春: 吉林科学技术出版社, 504–508. 程松林. 2009. 凝冻灾害对江西武夷山白鹇种群的生态影响. 野生动物, 30(6): 314–316. 符国瑷, 冯绍信. 1995. 海南五指山森林的垂直分布及其特征. 广西植物, 15(1): 57–69. 高育仁, 余德群. 1995. 白鹇海南亚种的生态和现状. 动物学研究, 16(4): 353–358. 格玛嘉措, 董德福, 龙文祥. 1999. 白马鸡生态习性的初步观察. 动物学杂志, 34(1): 26–28. 龚笑飞, 程晓云, 曹华, 等. 2020. 社群性别结构对遂昌牛头山白鹇活动节律的影响. 丽水学院学报, 42(5): 31–36. 韩婉诗. 2014. 湖南九龙江国家森林公园白鹇生境选择的季节变化. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学硕士学位论文. 胡日查, 满初日嘎, 赵建国, 等. 2010. 红色红原鸡及其研究进展. 中国家禽, 32(1) : 45–48. 李生强. 2017. 广西弄岗和花坪保护区鸟兽多样性的比较研究—基于红外相机数据. 桂林: 广西师范大学硕士学位论文. 刘鹏. 2011. 官山自然保护区四种雉类的生境选择. 南京: 南京林业大学硕士学位论文. 刘鹏, 黄晓凤, 顾署生, 等. 2012. 江西官山自然保护区四种雉类的生境选择差异. 动物学研究, 33(2): 170–176. 吕盛寒. 2019. 基于红外相机技术对福建武夷山国家自然保护区白鹇(Lophura nycthemera)、黄腹角雉(Tragopan caboti)时空利用行为的研究. 厦门: 厦门大学硕士学位论文. 牛钰杰, 周建伟, 杨思维, 等. 2017. 坡向和海拔对高寒草甸山体土壤水热和植物分布格局的定量分解. 应用生态学报, 28(5): 1489–1497. 邵晨, 胡一中. 2005. 白鹇的夜栖息地选择及夜栖息行为. 浙江林学院学报, 22(5): 562–565. 孙玉军, 王效科, 王如松. 1999. 五指山保护区生态环境质量评价研究. 生态学报, 19(3): 365–370. 谭耀匡, 吴至康. 1981. 贵州白鹇的一新亚种——白鹇榕江亚种. 动物学研究, 2(4): 301–306. 王方, 叶思达, 汤永晶, 等. 2020. 云南哀牢山南段红原鸡与白鹇活动节律及种间关系. 野生动物学报, 41(3): 641–647. 熊志斌, 余登利, 谭成江, 等. 2003. 茂兰自然保护区白鹇种群数量与栖息地保护. 贵州大学学报自然科学版, 20(2): 200–204. 徐言朋, 郑家文, 丁平, 等. 2007. 官山白颈长尾雉活动区域海拔高度的季节变化及其影响因素. 生物多样性, 15(4): 337–343. 徐雨, 王彬, 窦亮, 等. 2017. 三种同域高山鸡形目鸟类的生境选择. 四川动物, 36(3): 258–265. 晏鸣霄, 孙楠, 顾伯健, 等. 2021. 同域分布的绿孔雀与白鹇时空生态位分化. 四川动物, 40(2): 150–158. 杨岚. 2000. 红红原鸡Gallus gallus在中国的分布与习性∥中国野生动物保护协会. 中国鸟类学研究——第四届海峡两岸鸟类学术研讨会文集. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 121–124. 杨小波, 林英, 梁淑群. 1994. 海南岛五指山的森林植被Ⅰ. 五指山的森林植被类型. 海南大学学报: 自然科学版, 12(3): 220–236. 余辰星, 杨岗, 李东, 等. 2011. 桂西南喀斯特山地雉类的生态分布和空间生态位分析. 动物学研究, 32(5): 549–555. 袁玲, 张春兰, 张海, 等. 2009a. 海南红原鸡繁殖期夜栖地的选择. 四川动物, 28(5): 652–657. 袁玲, 张春兰, 张海, 等. 2009b. 红原鸡海南亚种的巢址特征. 动物学研究, 30(4): 457–462. 郑光美. 2017. 中国鸟类分类与分布名录. 3版. 北京: 科学出版社, 1–15. 郑作新, 谭耀匡, 卢汰春, 等. 1978. 中国动物志: 鸟纲 第四卷 鸡形目. 北京: 科学出版社, 140–147.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

尹为治,李佳灵,刘辉,王友强,方正,饶晓东.2022.生境因子对海南五指山白鹇和红原鸡分布的影响.动物学杂志,57(4):544-553.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:303
  • 下载次数: 1163
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-10
  • 最后修改日期:2022-07-04
  • 录用日期:2022-06-27
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-18