同域分布马鹿与中华斑羚的冬夏季食物构成比较
作者:
基金项目:

赤峰市林业科技振兴计划项目(No. K2019002)


Differences in Winter and Summer Diet Composition between Sympatric Red Deer and Chinese Goral
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [1]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    同域分布的有蹄类动物面临食物资源竞争,而食物又是影响野生动物生存的关键因子之一,研究不同种类动物的食物构成可以反映其对栖息地条件的适应程度。本研究通过粪便显微分析法,对内蒙古赛罕乌拉国家级自然保护区马鹿(Cervus elaphus)和中华斑羚(Naemorhedus griseus)的冬、夏季食物构成进行比较分析。结果显示,马鹿在夏季取食22科48种植物,中华斑羚取食15科31种植物;在冬季,马鹿取食17科32种植物,中华斑羚取食13科23种植物。Pianka重叠指数显示,夏季时马鹿与中华斑羚食物重叠度为85.4%,冬季重叠度为77.6%。使用Levins指数计算,夏季时马鹿与中华斑羚的营养生态位分别是13.71和5.34,冬季时分别是11.08和4.02。在同一季节,马鹿取食植物的丰富度和均匀度均大于中华斑羚。本研究结果表明,马鹿与中华斑羚的食物选择对季节性食物资源变化具有适应性,但马鹿对环境的适应性高于中华斑羚;鉴于马鹿的分布范围广、种群数量多,建议在对物种与栖息地的保护中侧重于中华斑羚。

    Abstract:

    [Objectives] The availability of food resources is a key limiting factor of wildlife survival. Therefore, determining the competition status of sympatric species in relation to such resources is important for understanding their ecology and conservation requirements. The aim of this study was to analyze the competition status of sympatric Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) and Chinese Goral (Naemorhedus griseus) regarding diet composition and adaptability in Saihanwula Nature Reserve. [Methods] Using microscopic analysis of fresh fecal samples collected from August 2019 to July 2020 (Fig. 1), trophic niche width and overlap were calculated based on the diet composition of Red Deer and Chinese Goral. Significance tests for inter-seasonal and inter-species diet composition were carried out using a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis model. [Results] The results showed that Red Deer fed on 48 plant species from 22 families in summer, and Chinese Goral fed on 31 plant species from 15 families. In winter, Red Deer fed on 32 plant species from 17 families, and Chinese Goral fed on 23 plant species from 13 families (Table 1). The frequency of each diet item varied significantly by season (Red Deer: χ2 = 46.6, df = 5, P < 0.01; Chinese Goral: χ2 = 17.4, df = 3, P < 0.01) (Fig. 2), and the trophic niche widths were greater for Red Deer than Chinese Goral in summer (Levin’s index of 13.71 and 5.34, respectively) and winter (Levin’s index of 11.08 and 4.02, respectively). The two species had a large dietary overlap (85.4% in summer, 77.6% in winter), and the trophic niche and diet diversity indices in summer were all significantly higher than those in winter (Table 2). [Conclusion] The results indicate that Red Deer are more adaptable to seasonal changes in food resources, although Chinese Goral may also adjust their feeding strategies. Given the wide distribution range and large population size of Red Deer, it is recommended that more conservation efforts be focused on Chinese Goral and their habitats.

    参考文献
    Ahrens H, Pincus R. 1981. On two measures of unbalancedness in a one-way model and their relation to efficiency. Biometrical Journal, 23(1): 227–235. Camposa A A, Takatsuki S, Lhagvasuren B. 2004. Food overlap between Mongolian gazelles and livestock in Omnogobi, southern Mongolia. Ecological Research, 19(4): 455–460. Colwell R K, Futuyama D J. 1971. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology, 52(4): 567–576. Deng S, Li J, Qu Y, et al. 2021. Camera trap reveals the co-occurrence patterns of two sympatric muntjac species in southern Anhui Province, China: No spatial segregation. Ecology and Evolution, 11(24): 17801–17809. Estevo C A, Nagy-Reis M B, Nichols J D. 2017. When habitat matters: Habitat preferences can modulate co-occurrence patterns of similar sympatric species. PLoS One, 12(7): e0179489. Fisher J T, Anholt B, Bradbury S, et al. 2013. Spatial segregation of sympatric marten and fishers: The influence of landscapes and species-scapes. Ecography, 36(2): 240–248. Focardi S, Aragno P, Montanaro P, et al. 2006. Inter-specific competition from fallow deer (Dama dama) reduces habitat quality for the Italian roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Ecography, 29(3): 407–417. Hardin G. 1960. The competitive exclusion principle. Science, 131(2904): 1292–1297. Kruskal W H, Wallis W A. 1952. Use of ranks in one criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47: 583–621. Levins R. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Montague W D, Peter J V. 1985. A nutritional explanation for body-size patterns of ruminant and nonruminant herbivores. The American Naturalist, 125(5): 641–672. Owen S N, Mills M G. 2008. Predator-prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web. Journal of Animal Ecology, 77(1): 173–83. Pianka E R. 1973. The structure of lizard communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1): 53–74. Rautiainen H, Bergvall U A, Felton A M, et al. 2021. Nutritional niche separation between native roe deer and the nonnative fallow deer—a test of interspecific competition. Mammal Research, 66(3): 443–455. Roy K, Singh M, Singh M. 2011. Diet and dietary-niche breadth of diurnal rain forest primates in the Central Western Ghats, India. Folia Primatologica, 82(6): 283–298. Ruslin F, Matsuda I, Md-Zain B M. 2019. The feeding ecology and dietary overlap in two sympatric primate species, the long-tailed macaque (Macaca fascicularis) and dusky langur (Trachypithecus obscurus obscurus) in Malaysia. Primates, 60(1): 41–50. Sato J J, Shimada T, Kyogoku D, et al. 2018. Dietary niche partitioning between sympatric wood mouse species (Muridae: Apodemus) revealed by DNA meta‐barcoding analysis. Journal of Mammalogy, 99(4): 952–964. Schoener T W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185(4145): 27–39. Seiki T, Yuki M. 2020. Food habits of horses, cattle, and sheep-goats and food supply in the forest–steppe zone of Mongolia: A case study in Mogod sum (county) in Bulgan aimag (province). Journal of Arid Environments, 174: e104039. Shannon E C, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Illinois: Urbana University of Illinois Press. Wiegand H, Pielou E C. 1971. An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley Interscience. Biometrical Journal, 13: 219–220. Yoshihara Y, Ito T Y, Lhagvasuren B, et al. 2008. A comparison of food resources used by Mongolian gazelles and sympatric livestock in three areas in Mongolia. Journal of Arid Environments, 72(1): 48–55. Zengeya F M, Murwira A, Caron A, et al. 2015. Spatial overlap between sympatric wild and domestic herbivores links to resource gradients. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 1(2): 56–65. 曹伊凡, 苏建平. 2006. 一种用于食草动物粪便显微组织分析的临时装片新技术. 兽类学报, 26(4): 407–410. 曹伊凡, 张同作, 连新明, 等. 2009. 青海省可可西里地区几种有蹄类动物的食物重叠初步分析. 四川动物, 28(1): 49–54. 昶野, 张明明, 刘振生, 等. 2010. 贺兰山同域分布岩羊和马鹿的夏季食性. 生态学报, 30(6): 1486–1493. 初红军, 蒋志刚, 兰文旭. 2008. 蒙古野驴、鹅喉羚和家畜的食物重叠. 动物学报, 54(6): 941–954. 崔多英, 刘振生, 王小明, 等. 2007. 贺兰山马鹿冬季食性分析. 动物学研究, 28(4): 383–388. 何欢. 2015. 内蒙古高格斯台地区夏季和冬季马鹿食物组分比较研究. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学硕士学位论文. 胡磊. 2013. 基于红外自动相机技术的马鹿和狍活动节律与马鹿集群行为. 北京: 北京林业大学硕士学位论文. 蒋志刚, 马勇, 吴毅,等. 2011. 中国哺乳动物多样性. 生物多样性, 23(3): 351–364. 李桂林. 2005. 赛罕乌拉自然保护区志. 赤峰: 内蒙古科学技术出版社. 吕忠海, 冯源, 于沿泽, 等. 2020. 高食性重叠度对同域物种生境分离的影响——以马鹿和狍为例. 东北林业大学学报, 48(2): 72–75. 吕忠海, 张玮琪, 刘浩, 等. 2020. 西藏马鹿与同域野生有蹄类、家畜草青期食性比较. 应用生态学报, 31(2): 651–658. 唐书培, 姜秀丽, 王晓玲, 等. 2018. 内蒙古赛罕乌拉国家级自然保护区中华斑羚的季节性食物构成分析. 四川动物, 37(3): 311–316. 唐书培, 穆丽光, 王晓玲, 等. 2019. 基于MaxEnt模型的赛罕乌拉国家级自然保护区斑羚生境适宜性评价. 北京林业大学学报, 41(1): 102–108. 王仁忠. 1997. 放牧影响下羊草草地主要植物种群生态位宽度与生态位重叠的研究. 植物生态学报, 43(4): 9–16. 王志勇, 孟德怀, 骆颖, 等. 2019. 贺兰山马鹿春季食性分析. 野生动物学报, 40(4): 825–831. 杨婧, 陈照娟, 乌力吉, 等. 2019. 内蒙古赛罕乌拉国家级自然保护区中华斑羚行为节律初步研究. 四川动物, 38(3): 256–262. 雍世鹏, 邢莲莲, 李桂林, 等. 2011. 赛罕乌拉国家级自然保护区生物多样性编目. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学出版社, 722–735. 原宝东, 闫永峰. 2016. 鹊鸲冬季和春季取食生态位初步研究. 四川动物, 35(3): 426–430. 张金龙,马克平. 2014. 种间联结和生态位重叠的计算:spaa程序包. 中国生物多样性保护与研究进展. 北京:气象出版社, 165–174. 张书理. 2007. 内蒙古赛罕乌拉自然保护区植物多样性及其保护研究. 北京: 北京林业大学博士学位论文. 钟林强. 2020. 同域分布马鹿与梅花鹿采食和营养策略及采食生境评价. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学博士学位论文. 朱国芬. 2018. 内蒙古赛罕乌拉国家级自然保护区隔离长尾斑羚群体遗传结构及个体空间分布研究. 北京: 北京林业大学硕士学位论文. 朱明月, 杨淼, 张玮琪, 等. 2019. 黑龙江穆棱东北红豆杉自然保护区马鹿与狍冬季食性组成的比较. 东北林业大学学报, 47(5): 100–104.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

刘夫仁,贺伟,赛罕,冯中华,杨永昕,张正一,鲍伟东.2022.同域分布马鹿与中华斑羚的冬夏季食物构成比较.动物学杂志,57(6):845-854.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:251
  • 下载次数: 1244
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-24
  • 最后修改日期:2022-09-08
  • 录用日期:2022-09-05
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-12-15
  • 出版日期: 2022-12-15