功能、谱系多样性在机场鸟类群落研究中的应用——以扬州泰州国际机场为例
作者:
作者单位:

1.南京师范大学生命科学学院 南京 210046;2.扬州泰州国际机场 扬州 225831;3. 江苏省农业生物多样性培育与 利用研究中心 南京 210014;4.南京师范大学生命科学学院 南京 210046,南京师范大学分析测试中心 南京 210046

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41271057),江苏省农业生物多样性培育与利用研究中心委托研究项目(No. 100605-2022- KY-00210);江苏省林业科学研究院青年基金项目(JAF-2022-01)


Application of Functional and Phylogenetic Diversity in Airport Bird Communities: A Case Study of Yangzhou Taizhou International Airport
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Life Science,Nanjing Normal University;2.Yangzhou Taizhou International Airport

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [53]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • | | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    随着航空业的发展,野生动物与飞机之间的冲突愈发密集,机场鸟类群落多样性研究引起了大量关注。研究鸟类群落对生境类型的使用状况,可以掌握生境类型与鸟击风险的潜在关系,为机场环境改造提供理论依据。本研究于2019年7月至2021年11月,采用样点法对扬州泰州机场及周边8 km范围内的农田、湿地、林地和城镇4种生境中30个样点的鸟类群落进行调查。利用鸟类群落多样性指数,包括丰富度、多度、香农威纳多样性指数、辛普森多样性指数以及均匀度指数来表征群落的物种多样性,以及功能和谱系多样性,阐明机场周边4种生境的鸟类群落多样性差异。同时,基于多度加权的平均成对功能距离(MFD)和平均成对谱系距离(MPD)来表征群落的功能和谱系结构,探究群落构建机制,量化各多样性指标间的相关性。研究共记录扬州泰州国际机场鸟类88种,分别隶属于14目36科,目、科中数量最多的为雀形目(Passeriformes)和鹬科(Scolopacidae)。谱系和功能多样性在生境间差异显著,功能分散度在农田最高,城镇最低;谱系多样性指数在城镇最高,湿地最低。标准化效应值分析表明,随机生态过程影响了湿地鸟类群落功能和谱系的构建过程,农田、城镇、林地三种生境群落的聚集主要受到生境过滤作用的影响。研究鸟类群落多样性及生境因子有助于掌握生境类型与机场鸟类群落的关系,为机场及其周边环境整治提供理论帮助。

    Abstract:

    [Objectives] From July 2019 to November 2021, based on the data of bird community diversity surveys conducted at Yangzhou Taizhou International Airport and its surrounding areas, this study analyzed the species, function and phylogenetic diversity of bird communities in different habitats, to explore the function and phylogenetic structure of bird communities and the correlation between each index. This study investigated the construction process of the bird community in the human-disturbed airport environment and provided a theoretical basis for the prevention and control of bird disease in the airport and its surrounding areas. [Methods] The traditional point count method was used to investigate the bird community of 30 sampling sites in 4 habitats (Fig. 1). The statistical analysis included single-group t-test, with a total of 713 samples, which was the cumulative survey number of 30 samples in 2 years. A total of 2 224 individuals were included in the sample, which was the cumulative sum of the number of species observed during the survey of the sample sites. Traditional bird community diversity indices such as richness, abundance, Shannon-Wiener index, Simpson diversity index, and Pielou evenness index were used to characterize the species diversity, functional (FDis) and phylogenetic (Faith’ PD) diversity elucidates the differences in the diversity of bird communities around the airport for each habitat type. Meanwhile, based on the mean pairwise functional distance (MFD) and mean pairwise phylogenetic distance (MPD) weighted by abundance, the function and phylogenetic structures of the community were characterized, and the community assembly mechanisms, as well as correlations between various diversity indicators, were explored. The calculation and statistical analysis of this study were completed in R 4.0.0. A total of 30 survey samples were designed in this study, with a total of 713 survey samples and 2 224 observational data. [Results] Our results showed that (1) The species accumulation curves of the four habitats were close to asymptotes, indicating that the survey data of bird species were relatively complete and fully met the requirements of the analysis (Fig. 2). (2) A total of 88 bird species were recorded, belonging to 14 orders and 36 families, respectively. The largest number of orders and families were Passeriformes and Scolopacidae (Fig. 3). (3) FDis was highest in farmland and lowest in urban areas, and PD was highest in urban areas and lowest in wetlands (Fig. 4). (4) Standardized effect size analysis showed that random processes affected the function and phylogenetic construction of wetland bird communities, and the clustering of communities in the other three habitats was mainly affected by habitat filtering (Fig. 5). [Conclusion] The analysis of bird community diversity and related indicators in this study can grasp the relationship between habitat types and airport bird communities, and provide theoretical guidance for airport managers.

    参考文献
    Alquezar RD, Tolesano-Pascoli G, Gil D, Macedo RH. 2020. Avian biotic homogenization driven by airport-affected environments. Urban Ecosystems 23:507-517.
    Barbaro L, Giffard B, Charbonnier Y, van Halder I, Brockerhoff EG. 2014. Bird functional diversity enhances insectivory at forest edges: a transcontinental experiment. Diversity and Distributions 20:149-159.
    Batisteli AF, Tanaka MO, Souza AL. 2018. Bird functional traits respond to forest structure in riparian areas undergoing active restoration. Diversity 10:90.
    Blackwell BF, DeVault TL, Fernández-Juricic E, Dolbeer RA. 2009. Wildlife collisions with aircraft: a missing component of land-use planning for airports. Landscape and Urban Planning 93:1-9.
    Blackwell BF, Wright SE. 2006. Collisions of red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis), turkey vultures (Cathartes aura), and black vultures (Coragyps atratus) with aircraft: implications for bird strike reduction. Journal of Raptor Research 40:76-80.
    Blomberg SP, Garland Jr T, Ives AR. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
    Bouckaert R, Heled J, Kühnert D, Vaughan T, Wu C-H, Xie D, Suchard MA, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2014. BEAST 2: a software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003537.
    Cadotte MW, Tucker CM. 2017. Should environmental filtering be abandoned? Trends in ecology evolution 32:429–437.
    Camacho-Cervantes M, Ojanguren AF, MacGregor-Fors I. 2018. Birds from the burgh: bird diversity and its relation with urban traits in a small town. Journal of Urban Ecology 4:juy011.
    Coccon F, Zucchetta M, Bossi G, Borrotti M, Torricelli P, Franzoi P. 2015. A land-use perspective for birdstrike risk assessment: the attraction risk index. PloS one 10:e0128363.
    Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J. 2004. Interpolating, extrapolating, and comparing incidence‐based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717-2727.
    Conkling TJ, Belant JL, DeVault TL, Martin JA. 2018. Impacts of biomass production at civil airports on grassland bird conservation and aviation strike risk. Ecological applications 28:1168-1181.
    Cosset CC, Edwards DP. 2017. The effects of restoring logged tropical forests on avian phylogenetic and functional diversity. Ecological applications 27:1932–1945.
    DeVault TL, Belant JL, Blackwell BF, Martin JA, Schmidt JA, Wes Burger L, Patterson JW. 2012. Airports offer unrealized potential for alternative energy production. Environmental Management 49:517-522.
    DeVault TL, Blackwell BF, Seamans TW, Belant JL. 2016. Identification of off airport interspecific avian hazards to aircraft. The Journal of Wildlife Management 80:746-752.
    Dolbeer RA. 2006. Height distribution of birds recorded by collisions with civil aircraft. The Journal of Wildlife Management 70:1345-1350.
    Faith DP. 1992. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation 61:1–10.
    Fritz SA, Purvis A. 2010. Selectivity in mammalian extinction risk and threat types: a new measure of phylogenetic signal strength in binary traits. Conservation Biology 24:1042-1051.
    Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG. 2010. Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends in ecology evolution 25:90–98.
    He X, Brown C, Lin L. 2021. Relative importance of deterministic and stochastic processes for beta diversity of bird assemblages in Yunnan, China. Ecosphere 12:e03545.
    He X, Luo K, Brown C, Lin L. 2018. A taxonomic, functional, and phylogenetic perspective on the community assembly of passerine birds along an elevational gradient in southwest China. Ecology and evolution 8:2712–2720.
    Iglay RB, Buckingham BN, Seamans TW, Martin JA, Blackwell BF, Belant JL, DeVault TL. 2017. Bird use of grain fields and implications for habitat management at airports. Agriculture, Ecosystems Environment 242:34-42.
    Jeffery RF, Buschke FT. 2019. Urbanization around an airfield alters bird community composition, but not the hazard of bird–aircraft collision. Environmental Conservation 46:124-131.
    Jiang XL, Zhang WG, Wang G. 2007. Effects of different components of diversity on productivity in artificial plant communities. Ecological Research 22:629–634.
    Kowarik I. 2011. Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environmental pollution 159:1974–1983.
    Kraft NJ, Ackerly DD. 2010. Functional trait and phylogenetic tests of community assembly across spatial scales in an Amazonian forest. Ecological monographs 80:401–422.
    Laliberté E, Legendre P. 2010. A distance‐based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91:299–305.
    Mahmoudi S, Ilanloo SS, Shahrestanaki AK, Valizadegan N, Yousefi M. 2016. Effect of human-induced forest edges on the understory bird community in Hyrcanian forests in Iran: implication for conservation and management. Forest Ecology and Management 382:120–128.
    Mallord JW, Dolman PM, Brown AF, Sutherland WJ. 2007. Linking recreational disturbance to population size in a ground‐nesting passerine. Journal of Applied Ecology 44:185-195.
    Mao Q, Liao C, Wu Z, Guan W, Yang W, Tang Y, Wu G. 2019. Effects of land cover pattern along urban-rural gradient on bird diversity in wetlands. Diversity 11:86.
    Maure LA, Rodrigues RC, Alcantara ?V, Adorno BF, Santos DL, Abreu EL, Tanaka RM, Gon?alves RM, Hasui E. 2018. Functional Redundancy in bird community decreases with riparian forest width reduction. Ecology and evolution 8:10395–10408.
    Morlon H, Schwilk DW, Bryant JA, Marquet PA, Rebelo AG, Tauss C, Bohannan BJ, Green JL. 2011. Spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity. Ecology letters 14:141–149.
    Mouillot D, Graham NA, Villéger S, Mason NW, Bellwood DR. 2013. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends in ecology evolution 28:167–177.
    Pagel M. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 255:37–45.
    Pellissier V, Cohen M, Boulay A, Clergeau P. 2012. Birds are also sensitive to landscape composition and configuration within the city centre. Landscape and Urban Planning 104:181–188.
    Pennell CG, Popay AJ, Rolston MP, Townsend RJ, Lloyd-West CM, Card SD. 2016. Avanex unique endophyte technology: reduced insect food source at airports. Environmental entomology 45:101-108.
    Petchey OL, Gaston KJ. 2002. Functional diversity (FD), species richness and community composition. Ecology letters 5:402–411.
    Pfeiffer MB, Blackwell BF, DeVault TL. 2020. Collective effect of landfills and landscape composition on bird–aircraft collisions. Human–Wildlife Interactions 14:43–54.
    Pfeiffer MB, Kougher JD, DeVault TL. 2018. Civil airports from a landscape perspective: a multi-scale approach with implications for reducing bird strikes. Landscape and Urban Planning 179:38-45.
    Renner SC, Waltert M, Mühlenberg M. 2006. Comparison of bird communities in primary vs. young secondary tropical montane cloud forest in Guatemala. In. Forest Diversity and Management: Springer. p. 485–515.
    Si X, Cadotte MW, Zeng D, Baselga A, Zhao Y, Li J, Wu Y, Wang S, Ding P. 2017. Functional and phylogenetic structure of island bird communities. Journal of animal ecology 86:532-542.
    Sol D, González‐Lagos C, Moreira D, Maspons J, Lapiedra O. 2014. Urbanisation tolerance and the loss of avian diversity. Ecology letters 17:942–950.
    Soldatini C, Georgalas V, Torricelli P, Albores-Barajas YV. 2010. An ecological approach to birdstrike risk analysis. European Journal of Wildlife Research 56:623-632.
    Steele WK, Weston MA. 2021. The assemblage of birds struck by aircraft differs among nearby airports in the same bioregion. Wildlife Research 48:422–425.
    Stegen JC, Hurlbert AH. 2011. Inferring ecological processes from taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional trait β-diversity. PloS one 6:e20906.
    Thuiller W, Pollock LJ, Gueguen M, Münkemüller T. 2015. From species distributions to meta‐communities. Ecology letters 18:1321–1328.
    Tuomisto H, Ruokolainen L, Ruokolainen K. 2012. Modelling niche and neutral dynamics: on the ecological interpretation of variation partitioning results. Ecography 35:961–971.
    Viljoen IM, Bouwman H. 2016. Conflicting traffic: characterization of the hazards of birds flying across an airport runway. African Journal of Ecology 54:308-316.
    Villéger S, Grenouillet G, Brosse S. 2013. Decomposing functional β‐diversity reveals that low functional β‐diversity is driven by low functional turnover in European fish assemblages. Global Ecology and Biogeography 22:671–681.
    Wilman H, Belmaker J, Simpson J, de la Rosa C, Rivadeneira MM, Jetz W. 2014. EltonTraits 1.0: Species‐level foraging attributes of the world's birds and mammals: Ecological Archives E095‐178. Ecology 95:2027–2027.
    Winter M, Devictor V, Schweiger O. 2013. Phylogenetic diversity and nature conservation: where are we? Trends in ecology evolution 28:199-204.
    Wuczyński A. 2016. Farmland bird diversity in contrasting agricultural landscapes of southwestern Poland. Landscape and Urban Planning 148:108-119.
    王彦平, 宋云枫, 钟雨茜, 陈传武, 赵郁豪, 曾頔, 吴亦如, 丁平. 2021. 中国鸟类的生活史和生态学特征数据集. 生物多样性 29:1149.
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

苗可儿,钱薇雅,张俊,李鹏,胡超超,常青.2023.功能、谱系多样性在机场鸟类群落研究中的应用——以扬州泰州国际机场为例.动物学杂志,58(2):182-197.

复制
文章指标
  • 点击次数:383
  • 下载次数: 1418
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-18
  • 最后修改日期:2023-03-16
  • 录用日期:2023-03-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-04-28
  • 出版日期: 2023-04-20